QueenslandDrugCourtAct2000DrugCourtRegulation2006Current as at 16 November 2012NOTE—This is the last reprint before
lapse.Lapsed by 2000 Act No. 3 s 45
Information about this reprintThisregulationisreprintedasat16November2012.Thereprintshowsthelawasamended by all amendments that
commenced on or before that day (Reprints Act 1992 s5(c)).The reprint
includes a reference to the law by which each amendment was
made—see listof legislation and list of annotations in
endnotes. Also see list of legislation for anyuncommenced
amendments.This page is specific to this reprint. See
previous reprints for information about earlierchanges made under
the Reprints Act 1992. A table of reprints is included in the
endnotes.Also see endnotes for information about when
provisions commenced.SpellingThe spelling of
certain words or phrases may be inconsistent in this reprint or
with otherreprints because of changes made in various
editions of the Macquarie Dictionary (forexample, in the
dictionary, ‘lodgement’ has replaced ‘lodgment’). Variations of
spellingwill be updated in the next authorised
reprint.Dates shown on reprintsReprints dated at
last amendmentAllreprintsproducedonorafter1July2002,authorised (that is, hard copy) and
unauthorised (that is, electronic), are dated as at the lastdate
of amendment. Previously reprints were dated as at the date of
publication. If anauthorised reprint is dated earlier than an
unauthorised version published before 1 July2002,itmeansthelegislationwasnotfurtheramendedandthereprintdateisthecommencement of the last amendment.If the
date of an authorised reprint is the same as the date shown for an
unauthorisedversion previously published, it merely means
that the unauthorised version was publishedbeforetheauthorisedversion.Also,anyrevisededitionofthepreviouslypublishedunauthorised
version will have the same date as that version.Replacement reprint dateIf the date of an
authorised reprint is the same as the dateshown on another
authorised reprint it means that one is the replacement of the
other.
QueenslandDrug Court
Regulation 2006Contents1234566A789101112131415161718Schedule 1Schedule 2Schedule 3PageShort title . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .3Commencement . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .3Criteria for definition eligible
person in the Act . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .3Other offences for definition relevant
offence in the Act . . . . . . . .4Prescription for definition prescribed drug
offence in scheduleof the Act. . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
.4Declaration of drug courts . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .4Prescription of Magistrates Courts from
which a person may bereferred
for indicative
assessment .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .4Matter that may be considered when deciding about referring
aperson for indicative assessment
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .4Matters that may be considered when referring a person forindicative
assessment .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .5Matter that may be considered when deciding about referring
aperson for assessment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .5Maximum number of active intensive
drug rehabilitation orders
.5Guidelines
for facilities
for the
supervision and
control ofoffenders......................................5Matters that may be considered in delaying suspendedsentence if offender needs detoxification .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .6Prescription
of person
for definition
prescribed person in the Act6Way of providing information to drug court magistrate . . . . . . . . .7Protection
of personal
information about offenders
. . . . . . . . . . .7Guidelines for drug courts . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .8Minimum frequency for drug testing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .8Repeal . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .8Eligible persons—location
postcodes for
drug courts. . . . .9Other postcodes. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .10Other
offences for
definition relevant offence
in Act. . . . . . .11
Drug
Court Regulation 2006Drug Court Regulation 2006[s
1][as amended by all amendments that commenced
on or before 16 November2012]1Short
titleThisregulationmaybecitedastheDrugCourtRegulation2006.2CommencementThis regulation
commences on 3 July 2006.3Criteria for
definitioneligiblepersonin
the Act(1)The purpose of this section is to
prescribe criteria for section6(1)(d) of the
Act for a person appearing before a drug courtcharged with an
offence.(2)The criteria the person must satisfy
are as follows—(a)that, at the time the person is
referred for an indicativeassessment,thepersonresidesinalocationwithapostcode mentioned in schedule 1, column 2
or schedule2;(b)that, at the
time the person is referred for an assessment,thepersonresidesinalocationwithapostcodementioned in
schedule 1, column 2 or schedule 2;(c)that—(i)at
the time an intensive drug rehabilitation order ismadefortheperson,thepersonresidesinalocationwithapostcodestatedinschedule1,column 2 for the drug court stated in
schedule 1,column1beforewhichthepersonisappearing;andCurrent as at 16 November 2012Page
3
Drug
Court Regulation 2006[s 4](ii)the
person intends to reside in a location mentionedin
subparagraph (i) while the person is subject tothe
order.4Other offences for definitionrelevantoffencein
the ActFor section 8(1)(d) of the Act, an offence
against a provisionof the Criminal Code mentioned in schedule 3
punishable by atermofnotmorethan7yearsimprisonmentisarelevantoffence.5Prescription for definitionprescribeddrugoffenceinschedule of the ActForthescheduleoftheAct,definitionprescribeddrugoffence, paragraph (b),
an offence against a provision of theDrugsMisuseAct1986mentionedinschedule4isaprescribed drug
offence.6Declaration of drug courtsForsection9(1)oftheAct,theMagistratesCourtsatBeenleigh,Cairns,Ipswich,SouthportandTownsvillearedeclared to be drug courts.6APrescription of Magistrates Courts
from which a personmay be referred for indicative
assessmentA Magistrates Court in a Magistrates Court
district mentionedintheJusticesRegulation2004,schedule1thatincludesalocation with a postcode mentioned in
schedule 1, column 2orschedule2ofthisregulationisaMagistratesCourtforsection 12A(a) of the Act.7Matter that may be considered when
deciding aboutreferring a person for indicative
assessmentIn making a decision mentioned in section
12A(d) of the Act,a person may appear to a magistrate to be an
eligible person ifPage 4Current as at 16
November 2012
Drug
Court Regulation 2006[s 8]at the time of
the decision the person resides in a location witha
postcode mentioned in schedule 1, column 2 or schedule 2.8Matters that may be considered when
referring a personfor indicative assessmentIn
making a decision mentioned in section 12B of the Act, amagistrate may have regard to—(a)themaximumnumberofactiveintensivedrugrehabilitation
orders as prescribed under section 10; and(b)anyadvicefromthepersonappointedasthecourtcoordinator for drug courts by the chief
executive aboutwhether the maximum number has been
exceeded.9Matter that may be considered when
deciding aboutreferring a person for assessmentIn
making a decision mentioned in section 15(1) of the Act, aperson may appear to a magistrate to be an
eligible person if atthe time of the decision the person
resides in a location with apostcode
mentioned in schedule 1, column 2 or schedule 2.10Maximum number of active intensive
drug rehabilitationordersForsections12A(e),15(2)(c)and19(g)oftheAct,themaximumnumberofactiveintensivedrugrehabilitationordersfortheMagistratesCourtsatCairns,Townsville,Beenleigh,
Ipswich and Southport is a total of 40.11Guidelines for facilities for the
supervision and control ofoffenders(1)For
section 19(h) of the Act, the following are prescribed asguidelines about the availability for
allocating to an offenderfacilities to supervise and control
the offender’s participationin a
rehabilitation program—(a)the entity
providing the facilities is willing to accept theoffender;Current as at 16
November 2012Page 5
Drug
Court Regulation 2006[s 12](b)it
is reasonably likely the facilities will be available tothe
offender when they are needed;(c)the
facilities are of a suitable standard;(d)thechiefexecutive(correctiveservices)hasreceivedadvice about the
treatment proposed to be provided tothe offender at
the facility and is satisfied the treatmentis
appropriate.(2)TheChiefMagistrate,inconsultationwithadrugcourtmagistrate,maydevelopapolicyfordecidingwhetherafacility is of a suitable
standard.12Matters that may be considered in
delaying suspendedsentence if offender needs
detoxification(1)This section applies if—(a)a drug court magistrate is exercising
a power mentionedin section 21(a) of the Act about an
offender; and(b)themagistrateconsiderstheoffenderneedsdetoxificationbutadetoxificationfacilityisnotimmediately
available.(2)The drug court magistrate may
consider—(a)ifaprisonfacilityisavailable,whethertheprisonfacilitywillprovidealternativeaccommodationtothewatch-house where the offender is
being held; or(b)otherwise,whetherthewatch-housewillprovidesuitable
detoxification treatment.(3)For deciding
whether the standard of a facility is a suitablestandard,thedrugcourtmagistratemustapplythecriteriastated in the
policy developed by the Chief Magistrate undersection
11(2).13Prescription of person for
definitionprescribedpersoninthe ActForsection39(3)oftheAct,definitionprescribedperson,each of the persons mentioned in
schedule 5 is prescribed.Page 6Current as at 16
November 2012
Drug
Court Regulation 2006[s 14]14Way
of providing information to drug court magistrateFor
section 39 of the Act, compliance information given to adrug
court magistrate by a prescribed person—(a)may
be given to the magistrate by giving it to the clerkof
the court of the relevant drug court or to the personappointed as the court coordinator for drug
courts by thechief executive—(i)personally; or(ii)byuseofemail,faxorotherelectronictransmission;
and(b)ifnotgiveninwriting,mustbeconfirmedinwritingwithin24hours,unlessthemagistrateconsidersitunnecessary.15Protection of personal information about
offenders(1)For section 39C(5) of the Act,
definitionpersonal informationdocument,adocumentaboutanoffenderthatisgiventoadrugcourtis
prescribedtobeadocumenttowhichsection39C
of the Act applies.Examples—•a report by a member of a treatment
team•a medical, psychiatric or
psychological report•a document provided by the offender or
by friends or family of theoffender(2)While an offender is subject to an intensive
drug rehabilitationorder,eachpersonalinformationdocumentstoredontheoffender’sfilemustbeclearlyidentifiedasadrugcourtdocument.(3)Afteranintensivedrugrehabilitationorderends,eachpersonalinformationdocumentabouttheoffendermustbestored on the offender’s file in a
sealed envelope marked ‘notto be disclosed,
other than to the offender, without order of thecourt’.Current as at 16
November 2012Page 7
Drug
Court Regulation 2006[s 16]16Guidelines for drug courtsFor
section 43(3) of the Act, schedule 6 states guidelines fordrug
courts.17Minimum frequency for drug
testing(1)Forsection43(5)oftheAct,theminimumfrequencywithwhichoffendersmustbedrugtestedundertheoffenders’intensive drug
rehabilitation orders is as follows—(a)duringphase1ofrehabilitationundertheorder—5times in any
fortnight;(b)duringphase2ofrehabilitationundertheorder—3times in any
fortnight;(c)duringphase3ofrehabilitationundertheorder—2times in any
fortnight.(2)In this section—phase 1 of
rehabilitationmeans the period of rehabilitationduring which the aim is to get the offender
free of unlawfuldrugs.phase 2 of
rehabilitationmeans the period of rehabilitationduringwhichtheaimisstabilisingtheoffenderasfreeofunlawful drugs.phase 3 of
rehabilitationmeans the period of rehabilitationduringwhichtheaimistoreintegratetheoffenderintothecommunity after phase 2 of
rehabilitation.18RepealThe Drug
Rehabilitation (Court Diversion) Regulation 2000SL
No. 104 is repealed.Page 8Current as at 16
November 2012
Drug
Court Regulation 2006Schedule 2Schedule 2Other
postcodessections 3(2), 6A, 7 and 9Part
14000, 4005, 4006, 4007, 4008, 4009, 4010,
4011, 4012, 4013, 4014, 4017,4018, 4029, 4030,
4031, 4032, 4034, 4035, 4036, 4037, 4051, 4052, 4053,4054,
4055, 4060, 4061, 4064, 4065, 4066, 4067, 4068, 4072, 4101,
4102,4103, 4104, 4105, 4107, 4111, 4120, 4121,
4122, 4151, 4152, 4153, 4154,4155, 4158, 4159,
4160, 4161, 4169, 4170, 4171, 4172, 4173, 4174, 4178,4179,
4183, 4222, 4275, 4285, 4500, 4501, 4520, 4860, 4861, 4877,
4880,4881, 4882, 4883, 4884, 4885Part
24871, 4872, 4873—if the person’s place of
residence is within a 100kmradius of the
Magistrates Court at CairnsPage 10Current as at 16 November 2012
Schedule 3Drug Court
Regulation 2006Schedule 3Other offences
for definitionrelevantoffencein
Actsection 4Criminal
Codesection 328A(2) (Dangerous operation of a
vehicle)section 398(1) (Punishment of
stealing)section 408C(1) (Fraud)section 408D(2)
(Computer hacking and misuse)section 414
(Demanding property with menaces with intent tosteal)section427A(1)(Obtainingpropertybypassingvaluelesscheques)section 433(1)
(Receiving stolen property etc.)section 469
(Wilful damage), if the offence is not punishableas a
special case or, if the offence is punishable as a specialcase, the offence is punishable under
section 469, item 9(1)(Graffiti) or 10(1) (Educational
institutions)section 488(1) (Forgery and uttering)section 493 (Obliterating crossings on
cheques)section 494 (Making documents without
authority)section 514(1) (Personation in
general)Current as at 16 November 2012Page
11
Drug
Court Regulation 2006Schedule 4Schedule 4Prescribed drug offencessection 5Drugs
Misuse Act 1986section8(Producingdangerousdrugs),iftheoffenceispunishable under paragraph (b)(i), (c) or
(d) of the penalty forthe offencesection8A(1)(Publishingorpossessinginstructionsforproducingdangerousdrugs),iftheoffenceispunishableunder paragraph
(b) of the penalty for the offencesection9(Possessingdangerousdrugs),iftheoffenceispunishable under paragraph (b)(i) or (c) of
the penalty for theoffencePage 12Current as at 16 November 2012
Schedule 5Drug Court
Regulation 2006Schedule 5Prescribed
personssection 131Prescribed persons(1)The
following persons are prescribed—(a)each
of the following—(i)thepersonemployedasAdministrationOfficer(Drug Court Program SEQ) in the West
MoretonHospital and Health Service;(ii)eachpersonemployedasaHealthAssessmentOfficer(HealthAssessor)SEQintheWestMoreton Hospital
and Health Service;(iii)the person
employed as Health Coordinator SEQ,Drug Court
Program in the West Moreton Hospitaland Health
Service;(iv)the person
employed as Health Court AssessmentOfficer,DrugCourtCairnsintheCairnsandHinterland Hospital and Health
Service;(v)the person employed as Health Court
AssessmentOfficer, Drug Court Townsville in the
TownsvilleHospital and Health Service;(vi)the person
employed as Health Court Coordinator,DrugCourtCairnsintheCairnsandHinterlandHospital and
Health Service;(vii) the person employed as Health Court
Coordinator,Drug Court Townsville in the Townsville
Hospitaland Health Service;(b)personsactingfortheScientificServices,QueenslandHealth and
appointed by the chief executive (health) asprescribed
persons for section 39 of the Act;(c)personsactingforTAFEinstitutesorstatutoryTAFEinstitutesandappointedbythechiefexecutiveCurrent as at 16 November 2012Page
13
Drug
Court Regulation 2006Schedule 5(vocationaleducationandtraining)asprescribedpersons for
section 39 of the Act;(d)correctiveservicesofficersappointedbythechiefexecutive (corrective services) as
prescribed persons forsection 39 of the Act;(e)persons acting for the Commonwealth
Services DeliveryAgency(Centrelink)andappointedbythechiefexecutiveofficeroftheAgencyasprescribedpersonsfor
section 39 of the Act.Note to paragraph (e)—The Commonwealth Services Delivery
Agency and the positionof chief executive officer are
established by theCommonwealthServices
Delivery Agency Act 1997(Cwlth), section 6.(2)In this section—chiefexecutive(vocationaleducationandtraining)meansthe
chief executive of the department in which theVocationalEducation,TrainingandEmploymentAct2000isadministered.Page 14Current as at 16 November 2012
Schedule 6Drug Court
Regulation 2006Schedule 6Guidelines for
drug courtssection 161Definitions for sch 6In this
schedule—courtreviewmeansareviewbyadrugcourtrequiringtheattendance of an offender who is subject to
an intensive drugrehabilitation order.interested
entitysee section 36A(3) of the Act.relevant drug court team, for an
offender, means the personswho—(a)act for an interested entity;
and(b)attend a court review, or any
preliminary hearing, aboutthe offender.2Frequency of court reviews(1)Theminimumfrequencyofattendancesrequiredbeforeadrugcourtmagistratebyanoffenderwhoissubjecttoanintensivedrugrehabilitationorder,whethertheattendancesareorderedbyadrugcourtmagistrateordirectedbyanauthorised corrective services
officer, is once in any month,unless a drug
court magistrate otherwise directs.Example of when
a drug court magistrate may otherwise direct—If
the offender returns a positive drug test, a drug court magistrate
maydirect the offender to attend weekly for a
month to assess whether theoffender is satisfactorily complying
with the offender’s intensive drugrehabilitation
order.(2)Also,anauthorisedcorrectiveservicesofficermaydirectmore frequent
attendances if—(a)theofficerallegestheoffenderisnotsatisfactorilycomplyingwiththeoffender’sintensivedrugrehabilitation
order; orCurrent as at 16 November 2012Page
15
Drug
Court Regulation 2006Schedule 6Example of an
allegation for paragraph (a)—anallegationbasedonapositivedrugtestreturnedbytheoffender(b)there has been a change in the
offender’s circumstancesthat requires the offender’s
rehabilitation program to bereviewed.Example of change in circumstances for
paragraph (b)—the offender’s eviction from
accommodation3Court reviews(1)Before a court review, a drug court
magistrate may conduct apreliminaryhearingintheoffender’sabsencetodecidetheambitofthecourtreviewandthematerialthemagistratewishes to have
produced.(2)In addition to a member of the
relevant drug court team for anoffender, the
magistrate may allow other persons to take partin the court
review and any preliminary hearing.4Treatment team(1)Thepersonsmentionedinschedule5,section1(1)(d)andhealthprofessionalswhomthechiefexecutive(health)decidesareappropriatelyqualifiedtoperformthefunctionsmentioned in
paragraphs (a) and (b) are responsible for—(a)assessing an offender’s compliance with the
offender’sintensivedrugrehabilitationorder,includingtheoffender’sparticipationintheoffender’srehabilitationprogram;
and(b)providingsupport,treatmentandhelprelevanttotheorder, as
required by the offender.(2)Thepersonsmentionedinsubsection(1)arethetreatmentteam.(3)Unlesstherearespecialcircumstances,thetreatmentteammustgiveadocumenttobeusedatacourtreviewforanoffendertoamemberoftheproposedrelevantdrugcourtteam for the
offender at least 2 days before the review.Page 16Current as at 16 November 2012
EndnotesDrug Court
Regulation 2006Endnotes1Index to endnotesPage2Date to which amendments incorporated
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
.173Key . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . .174Table of reprints
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .185List
of legislation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .186List of annotations . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . .192Date to which amendments
incorporatedThis is the reprint date mentioned in the
Reprints Act 1992, section 5(c). Accordingly, thisreprint includes all amendments that
commenced operation on or before 16 November2012. Future
amendments of the Drug Court Regulation 2006 may be made in
accordancewith this reprint under the Reprints Act
1992, section 49.3KeyKey to
abbreviations in list of legislation and annotationsKeyAIAamdamdtchdefdivexpgazhdginslapnotfdnumo in
comorigpparaprecpresprevExplanation=Acts
Interpretation Act 1954=amended=amendment=chapter=definition=division=expires/expired=gazette=heading=inserted=lapsed=notified=numbered=order in council=omitted=original=page=paragraph=preceding=present=previousCurrent as at 16
November 2012Key(prev)procprovptpubdR[X]RArelocrenumrep(retro)rvsschsdivSIASIRSLsubunnumExplanation=previously=proclamation=provision=part=published=Reprint No. [X]=Reprints Act 1992=relocated=renumbered=repealed=retrospectively=revised edition=section=schedule=subdivision=Statutory Instruments Act 1992=Statutory Instruments Regulation
2002=subordinate legislation=substituted=unnumberedPage
17
Drug
Court Regulation 2006Endnotes4Table of reprintsReprints are
issued for both future and past effective dates. For the most
up-to-date tableof reprints, see the reprint with the latest
effective date.Ifareprintnumberincludesaletterofthealphabet,thereprintwasreleasedinunauthorised, electronic form only.ReprintNo.11A1B1C1D1E1FAmendments includednone2006 SL No. 3162008 SL No.
812008 SL No. 1982010 SL No.
3022012 SL No. 902012 SL No.
201Effective3 July
20061 January 20071 April
20081 July 200829 October
20101 July 201216 November
2012Notes5List
of legislationRegulatory impact statementsFor
subordinate legislation that has a regulatory impact statement,
specific reference to the statementis included in
this list.Explanatory notesAll subordinate
legislation made on or after 1 January 2011 has an explanatory
note. For subordinatelegislation made before 1 January 2011
that has an explanatory note, specific reference to the note
isincluded in this list.Drug Court
Regulation 2006 SL No. 165made by the Governor in Council on 29
June 2006notfd gaz 30 June 2006 pp 1060–7ss
1–2 commenced on date of notificationremaining
provisions commenced 3 July 2006 (see s 2)exp 1 September
2016 (see SIA s 54)Note—The expiry date may have changed since
this reprint was published. See thelatest reprint of
the SIR for any change.amending legislation—State
Penalties Enforcement and Other Legislation Amendment Regulation
(No. 1)2006 SL No. 316 pts 1–2notfd gaz 15
December 2006 pp 1861–5ss 1–2 commenced on date of
notificationremaining provisions commenced 1 January
2007 (see s 2)Vocational Education, Training and Employment
and Other Legislation AmendmentRegulation (No.
1) 2008 SL No. 81 pts 1, 4notfd gaz 28 March 2008 pp
1721–4Page 18Current as at 16
November 2012
Drug
Court Regulation 2006Endnotesss 1–2 commenced
on date of notificationremaining provisions commenced 1 April
2008 (see s 2)Drug Court Amendment Regulation (No. 1) 2008
SL No. 198notfd gaz 27 June 2008 pp 1268–78ss
1–2 commenced on date of notificationremaining
provisions commenced 1 July 2008 (see s 2)Drug Court
Amendment Regulation (No. 1) 2010 SL No. 302notfd gaz 29
October 2010 pp 591–2commenced on date of
notificationHealth and Hospitals Network and Other
Legislation Amendment Regulation (No. 1)2012 SL No. 90
pts 1, 4 div 1notfd gaz 29 June 2012 pp 704–10ss
1–2 commenced on date of notificationremaining
provisions commenced 1 July 2012 (see s 2)Drug Court
Amendment Regulation (No. 1) 2012 SL No. 201notfd gaz 16
November 2012 pp 345–6commenced on date of
notification6List of annotationsCriteria for definition “eligible person” in
the Acts 3amd 2008 SL No. 198 s 4PrescriptionofMagistratesCourtsfromwhichapersonmaybereferredforindicative assessments 6Ains
2008 SL No. 198 s 5Maximum number of active intensive drug
rehabilitation orderss 10amd 2008 SL No.
198 s 6; 2012 SL No. 201 s 3Protection of
personal information about offenderss 15amd
2008 SL No. 198 s 7SCHEDULE 1—ELIGIBLE PERSONS—LOCATION
POSTCODES FOR DRUGCOURTSsch hdgamd
2008 SL No. 198 s 8sch 1amd 2010 SL No. 302 s 3SCHEDULE 2—OTHER POSTCODESsub
2008 SL No. 198 s 9amd 2010 SL No. 302 s 4SCHEDULE
5—PRESCRIBED PERSONSPrescribed personss 1amd
2008 SL No. 81 s 28; 2008 SL No. 198 s 10; 2012 SL No. 90 s
26Current as at 16 November 2012Page
19