QueenslandDrugCourtAct2000Current as at 20 June 2013NOTE—This is the last reprint before
repeal.Repealed by 2000 Act No. 3 s 45Repealed on 30 June 2013
Information about this reprintThis
reprint shows the legislation current as at the date on the cover
and is authorised bythe Parliamentary Counsel.AnewreprintofthelegislationwillbepreparedbytheOfficeoftheQueenslandParliamentary
Counsel when any change to the legislation takes effect. This
change maybe because a provision of the original
legislation, or an amendment to it, commences orbecause a particular provision of the
legislation expires or is repealed.When a new reprint is prepared, this reprint will become a historical reprint. Also, if it isnecessary to replace this reprint before a new reprint is prepared, for example, to includeamendments with a retrospective commencement, an appropriate note would be includedonthecoverofthereplacementreprintandonthecopyofthisreprintatwww.legislation.qld.gov.au.The
endnotes to this reprint contain detailed information about the
legislation and reprint.For example—•The
table of reprints endnote lists any previous reprints and, for this
reprint, givesdetails of any discretionary editorial
powers under theReprints Act 1992used by
theOffice of the Queensland Parliamentary
Counsel in preparing it.•Thelistoflegislationendnotegiveshistoricalinformationabouttheoriginallegislationandthelegislationwhichamendedit.Italsogivesdetailsofuncommencedamendmentstothislegislation.Forinformationaboutpossibleamendments to the
legislation by Bills introduced in Parliament, see the
QueenslandLegislationCurrentAnnotationsatwww.legislation.qld.gov.au/Leg_Info/information.htm.•The list of annotations endnote gives
historical information at section level.All Queensland
reprints are dated and authorised by the Parliamentary Counsel.
Theprevious numbering system and distinctions
between printed and electronic reprints arenot
continued.
Drug
Court Act 2000Drug Court Act 2000Part 1
Preliminary[s 1][as amended by
all amendments that commenced on or before 20 June 2013]AnActtoprovideadrugcourtprogramforintensivedrugrehabilitation of drug dependent
offendersPart 1Preliminary1Short
titleThis Act may be cited as theDrug
Court Act 2000.2CommencementThis Act
commences on a day to be fixed by proclamation.3Objects of this Act(1)The
objects of this Act are—(a)toreducethelevelofdrugdependencyinthecommunityandthedrugdependencyofeligiblepersons;
and(b)to reduce the level of criminal
activity associated withdrug dependency; and(c)toreducethehealthrisksassociatedwithdrugdependency of
eligible persons; and(d)topromotetherehabilitationofeligiblepersonsandtheir re-integration into the
community; andCurrent as at 20 June 2013Page
5
Drug
Court Act 2000Part 2 Definitions and important
terms[s 4](e)to
reduce pressure on resources in the court and prisonsystems.(2)The
objects are to be achieved by establishing drug courts.4Relationship with Penalties and
Sentences Act 1992(1)A drug court magistrate—(a)must have regard to the principles
stated in thePenaltiesand Sentences
Act 1992, section 9; and(b)mayexercisethepowersandmaketheordersamagistrate may exercise or make under that
Act.(2)Subsection (1) applies unless a
contrary intention appears.4ANotes in
textA note in the text of this Act is part of
the Act.Part 2Definitions and
importantterms5DefinitionsThe dictionary
in the schedule defines particular words usedin this
Act.6Who is aneligible
person(1)A person charged with an offence is
aneligible personif—(a)the person is not a person who must be
dealt with as achild under theYouth Justice
Act 1992; and(b)thepersonisdrugdependentandthatdependencycontributed to
the person committing the offence; andPage 6Current as at 20 June 2013
Drug
Court Act 2000Part 2 Definitions and important
terms[s 6](c)it
is likely the person would, if convicted of the offence,be
sentenced to imprisonment; and(d)the
person satisfies any other criteria prescribed under aregulation.(2)Without limiting subsection (1)(d), the
regulation may requirethatthepersonbesomeonewhoresideswithinastatedlocality at the
time—(a)the person is referred for an
indicative assessment; or(b)the person is
referred for an assessment; or(c)anintensivedrugrehabilitationorderismadefortheperson.(3)The
person is not aneligible personif—(a)the person is serving a term of
imprisonment other thana community term of imprisonment;
or(b)thepersonisthesubjectofaparoleorderthatiscancelled by a parole board and the
person is to servetheunexpiredportionoftheperson’speriodofimprisonment; or(c)a
charge against the person for a disqualifying offence ispending in a court.Note for
subsection (3)(a)—A person released on parole is taken
to be still serving the sentenceimposed on the
person:Corrective Services Act 2006,
section 214.(4)For the purpose of deciding whether a
person ordered to servea term of imprisonment under a law of
another State or theCommonwealth (therelevant
law) is a person serving a termof
imprisonment for subsection (3)(a)—(a)theCorrectiveServicesAct2006, section 214
applies;and(b)a reference in
theCorrective Services Act 2006,
section214 to parole includes a reference to a
release under therelevant law that is similar to
parole.(5)In this section—Current as at 20
June 2013Page 7
Drug
Court Act 2000Part 2 Definitions and important
terms[s 7]parole
orderincludes a release under a law of another
State orthe Commonwealth that is similar to a parole
order.7What is adisqualifying
offence(1)Adisqualifying
offenceis—(a)an offence of a
sexual nature; or(b)anoffenceinvolvingviolenceagainstanotherperson,other than an
offence charged under any of the followingprovisions of
the Criminal Code—•section 335•section340(1)(a),butonlyiftheoffenceistheassault of another with intenttoresistorpreventthe lawful
arrest or detention of the person or ofany other
person•section 340(1)(b)•section 413.(2)Forsection6(3)(c),areferenceinsubsection(1)toaprovisionoftheCriminalCodeincludesareferencetoacorrespondingprovisionofalawofanotherStateortheCommonwealth.(3)Forsubsection(1),anoffenceofasexualnaturedoesnotinclude an offence by a prostitute in
providing prostitution, orin offering or accepting an offer to
provide prostitution.(4)For subsection
(1)(b), an offenceinvolvingviolenceagainstanotherpersonisanoffencethatinvolvesanyallegationofpersonal violence, whether as an element of
the offence or asan act of violence associated with the
offence.Examples of offences involving violence
other than as an element of theoffence—•operating a
vehicle dangerously involving dragging a person behindthe
vehicle•operating a vehicle dangerously
involving intentionally collidingwith another
vehicle or a person•breaching a domestic violence order
involving a wilful injuryPage 8Current as at 20
June 2013
Drug
Court Act 2000Part 2 Definitions and important
terms[s 7A]7AWhat
is acommunity term of imprisonment(1)Atermofimprisonmentinrelationtoapersonisacommunity term of imprisonmentif
the person is ordered toserve the term of imprisonment—(a)by way of intensive correction in the
community underan intensive correction order made under
thePenaltiesand Sentences
Act 1992, section 112; or(b)inasimilarwayunderanordermadeunderalawofanother State or
the Commonwealth.(2)However, a term of imprisonment is not
acommunity term ofimprisonmentiftheordermentionedinsubsection(1)wasrevoked and the person was committed
to prison.8What is arelevant
offence(1)Each of the following is arelevant offence—(a)a simple offence;(b)an
indictable offence being dealt with summarily;Examples of
provisions requiring or permitting indictable offencesto be
dealt with summarily—•CriminalCode,section552A(Chargesofindictableoffencesthatmustbeheardanddecidedsummarilyonprosecution election)•CriminalCode,section552B(Chargesofindictableoffences that
must be heard and decided summarily unlessdefendant elects
for jury trial)•CriminalCode,section552BA(Chargesofindictableoffences that
must be heard and decided summarily)•Drugs
Misuse Act 1986, section 13 (Certain offences maybe
dealt with summarily) or 14 (Other offences that may bedealt
with summarily if no commercial purpose alleged)(c)a prescribed drug offence;Current as at 20 June 2013Page
9
Drug
Court Act 2000Part 3 Drug courts and drug court
magistrates[s 9](d)anotheroffenceprescribedunderaregulationthatispunishable by imprisonment for a term
of not more than7 years.(2)A
relevant offence does not include a disqualifying offence.Part
3Drug courts and drug courtmagistrates9Drug
courts(1)TheGovernorinCouncil,byregulation,maydeclare1ormore Magistrates Courts to be drug
courts.(2)A court is a drug court under
subsection (1) whether or not itis constituted
by a drug court magistrate.(3)However,apowerofadrugcourtmagistratemaybeexercised only in a drug court.10Drug court magistrates(1)TheChiefMagistratemustallocatethefunctionsofadrugcourt magistrate
to 1 or more magistrates.(2)NothinginthisActpreventsadrugcourtmagistrateexercising the
jurisdiction of a Magistrates Court at any time.11Functions, additional jurisdiction and
powers of drugcourt magistrates(1)A
drug court magistrate has the functions given by this Act.(2)For the performance of a drug court
magistrate’s functions, adrugcourtmagistratehasjurisdictiontodealwithapersonappearingbeforethemagistratechargedwithaprescribeddrug
offence.Page 10Current as at 20
June 2013
Drug
Court Act 2000Part 3A Indicative assessment of drug
dependency[s 12](3)A
drug court magistrate has power to do all things necessaryorconvenienttobedonefortheperformanceofthemagistrate’s functions.(4)A drug court magistrate must conduct
proceedings under thisActquicklyandinawaythatavoidsunnecessarytechnicalities
and facilitates the fair and practical conduct ofthe
proceedings.(5)In a proceeding under this Act, the
drug court magistrate isnot bound by the rules of evidence,
but may inform himself orherself in any way the magistrate
considers appropriate.12Other functions
of drug court magistrates(1)This Act does
not affect the application of theMagistrates
Act1991to a drug court
magistrate.(2)For example, a drug court magistrate,
in addition to exercisingfunctions as a drug court magistrate,
must—(a)exercise other functions as a
magistrate as directed bythe Chief Magistrate; and(b)complywithreasonabledirectionsgiven,orrequirements made, by the Chief
Magistrate.Part 3AIndicative
assessment of drugdependency12AApplication of pt 3AThis part
applies if—(a)a person charged with a relevant
offence appears beforea magistrate in a Magistrates Court
prescribed under aregulation for this section; andCurrent as at 20 June 2013Page
11
Drug
Court Act 2000Part 3A Indicative assessment of drug
dependency[s 12B](b)thepersonhaspleadedguiltytotheoffenceorhasindicatedthatheorsheintendstopleadguiltytotheoffence;
and(c)themagistrateissatisfiedthepersonmaybedrugdependent;
and(d)the person appears, to the magistrate,
to be an eligibleperson; and(e)themaximumnumberofactiveintensivedrugrehabilitationordersprescribedunderaregulationhasnot
been exceeded.Note—Seesection12B(1A)fortheendingofreferralsforindicativeassessment under
this part.12BReferral for indicative
assessment(1)Themagistratemaydecidetoreferthepersonforanindicative assessment.(1A)However, a
magistrate must not decide to refer a person for anindicative assessment on or after the
relevant day.(2)If the magistrate decides to refer the
person for an indicativeassessment,themagistratemayadjourntheproceedingsand—(a)remand the person in custody to appear
before a drugcourt magistrate; or(b)release the person on bail to appear before
a drug courtmagistrate.(3)If
the magistrate adjourns the proceedings to refer the personfor
an indicative assessment, the magistrate must require—(a)the person to attend at the times and
places decided bythe chief executive (health) for an
indicative assessmentbyanappropriatelyqualifiedhealthprofessionaldecided by the
chief executive (health); and(b)the
chief executive (health) to prepare and submit to adrugcourtmagistrate,withinthetimeallowedbythePage 12Current as at 20 June 2013
Drug
Court Act 2000Part 3A Indicative assessment of drug
dependency[s 12C]magistrate,areport(anindicativeassessmentreport)containing an indicative assessment of
the person by theappropriately qualified health
professional.(4)The magistrate may require the
indicative assessment report tobe given orally
or in writing.Note—See section 12E
for how a drug court magistrate must deal with theproceeding after an indicative assessment
report has been submitted.(5)Ifthemagistrateremandsthepersonincustody,thechiefexecutive
(corrective services) must ensure the person—(a)isassessedbyanappropriatelyqualifiedhealthprofessional
decided by the chief executive (health); and(b)appears before a drug court magistrate to be
dealt withas required by the drug court
magistrate.12CIndicative assessment reports(1)When required to do so by a
magistrate, the chief executive(health)mustarrangeforanappropriatelyqualifiedhealthprofessional to
prepare an indicative assessment report for adrugcourtmagistrateaboutastatedpersonremandedorrequired to appear before the drug court
magistrate.(2)Theindicativeassessmentreportmustbegiventothedrugcourt magistrate
within the time allowed under section 12B(3)by the
magistrate.(3)The drug court magistrate must give a
copy of the indicativeassessment report to—(a)the prosecuting authority that
appeared before the courtwhentheoffenderwasreferredforanindicativeassessment;
and(b)the person’s legal representatives;
and(c)the chief executive (corrective
services).(4)Thedrugcourtmagistratemustensuretheprosecutingauthority and
the person’s legal representatives have sufficientCurrent as at 20 June 2013Page
13
Drug
Court Act 2000Part 4 Referral for assessment[s
12D]timebeforetheproceedingstoconsiderandrespondtothereport.12DAdditional matters for indicative assessment
report(1)The drug court magistrate may order
that the report, or part ofthe report, not
be shown to the person.(2)Areportpurportingtobeanindicativeassessmentreportmadebyanappropriatelyqualifiedhealthprofessionalisevidence of the matters contained in
it.(3)An objection must not be taken or
allowed to the evidence onthe ground that it is hearsay.(4)To remove any doubt, it is declared
that this section does notlimit the jurisdiction and powers of
the drug court magistrateunder section 11.12EDealing with proceedings after submission of
indicativeassessment report(1)If
an indicative assessment report about a person is given to adrugcourtmagistrateonoraftertherelevantday,themagistratemustexercisethejurisdictionofaMagistratesCourt and deal
with the person according to law.(2)Adrugcourtmagistratemaytakeaccountoftheindicativeassessment
report when sentencing the person for the offence.Part
4Referral for assessment13Application of pt 4This part
applies if—(a)a person charged with a relevant
offence appears beforea drug court magistrate; and(b)there is evidence the person is drug
dependent.Page 14Current as at 20
June 2013
Drug
Court Act 2000Part 4 Referral for assessment[s
14]Note—See section 16C
for the ending of referrals for assessment under thispart.14Referral to be decided as soon as
practicable(1)The powers conferred on a drug court
magistrate under thispart must be exercised as soon as
practicable after the personfirst comes
before the drug court for a relevant offence.(2)Despite subsection (1), the powers may be
exercised at anytimebeforethecourtsentencesthepersonorcommitstheperson for trial or sentence for the
offence.15Deciding whether to refer for
assessment(1)Thedrugcourtmagistratemustdecidewhetherthepersonappears to be an
eligible person.(2)If the person appears to be an
eligible person, the drug courtmagistratemaydecidetoreferthepersonforassessmentifsatisfied—(a)thepersonhaspleadedguiltytotheoffenceorhasindicatedthatheorsheintendstopleadguiltytotheoffence;
and(b)thepersoniswillingtobeassessedforsuitabilityforrehabilitationandtoappearbeforeadrugcourtmagistrate to be dealt with for the offence;
and(c)themaximumnumberofactiveintensivedrugrehabilitationordersprescribedunderaregulationhasnot
been exceeded.(3)However,amagistratemustnotmakeadecisionaboutwhether the person appears to be an eligible
person, or to referthe person for assessment on or after the
relevant day.Current as at 20 June 2013Page
15
Drug
Court Act 2000Part 4 Referral for assessment[s
16]16Referral for assessment(1)If the drug court magistrate
(thereferring magistrate) decidestoreferthepersonforassessment,thereferringmagistratemay adjourn the
proceedings and—(a)remand the person in custody to appear
before a drugcourt magistrate; or(b)release the person on bail to appear before
a drug courtmagistrate.(2)Ifthereferringmagistrateadjournstheproceedings,thereferringmagistratemustrequirethechiefexecutive(correctiveservices)toprepareandsubmittoadrugcourtmagistrate,withinthetimeallowedbythereferringmagistrate,apre-sentencereportundertheCorrectiveServices Act
2006, section 344 that contains—(a)anassessmentoftheperson’ssuitabilityforrehabilitation; and(b)ifthepersonissuitable,aproposedrehabilitationprogram.(3)Also, if the referring magistrate
adjourns the proceedings, thereferring
magistrate must require the chief executive (health)to
prepare and submit to a drug court magistrate, within thetime
allowed by the referring magistrate, a written report (anassessment report) containing an
assessment of the person byan appropriately
qualified health professional.(4)Ifthereferringmagistratereleasesthepersononbail,thegrant of bail must be made subject to the
condition that, forthepurposeofpreparingthepre-sentencereportandassessment report, the person—(a)reportstoanauthorisedcorrectiveservicesofficerwithin a stated
time; and(b)reports to other persons at the times
and places directedby an authorised corrective services
officer, including toanappropriatelyqualifiedhealthprofessionaldecidedby
the chief executive (health) for assessment.Page 16Current as at 20 June 2013
Drug
Court Act 2000Part 4 Referral for assessment[s
16A](5)If the referring magistrate remands
the person in custody, thechief executive (corrective services)
must ensure the person—(a)isassessedbyanappropriatelyqualifiedhealthprofessional
decided by the chief executive (health); and(b)appears before a drug court magistrate to be
dealt withas required by the drug court
magistrate.Note—See section 16C
for how a drug court magistrate must deal with theproceeding if an assessment report or a
pre-sentence report is submittedon or after the
relevant day.16AAssessment report(1)Whenrequiredtodosoundersection16(3)byareferringmagistrate,thechiefexecutive(health)mustarrangeforanappropriatelyqualifiedhealthprofessionaltoprepareanassessment report for a drug court
magistrate about a statedperson remanded or required to appear
before the drug courtmagistrate.(2)Theassessmentreportmustbegiventothedrugcourtmagistrate within the time allowed by the
referring magistrate.(3)The drug court
magistrate must give a copy of the assessmentreport
to—(a)the prosecuting authority that
appeared before the courtwhen the offender was referred for
assessment; and(b)the person’s legal representatives;
and(c)the chief executive (corrective
services).(4)Thedrugcourtmagistratemustensuretheprosecutingauthority and
the person’s legal representatives have sufficienttimebeforetheproceedingstoconsiderandrespondtotheassessment report.Note—See section 16C for how a drug court
magistrate must deal with theproceeding if an
assessment report or a pre-sentence report is submittedon or
after the relevant day.Current as at 20 June 2013Page
17
Drug
Court Act 2000Part 5 Intensive drug rehabilitation
orders[s 16B]16BAdditional matters for assessment
report(1)Thedrugcourtmagistratemayorderthattheassessmentreport, or part
of the assessment report, not be shown to theperson.(2)A report purporting to be an
assessment report made by anappropriately
qualified health professional is evidence of thematters contained in it.(3)An
objection must not be taken or allowed to the evidence onthe
ground that it is hearsay.16CDealing with
proceedings after submission ofassessment report
and pre-sentence report(1)If an assessment
report or a pre-sentence report about a personis given to a
drug court magistrate on or after the relevant day,the
magistrate must exercise the jurisdiction of a MagistratesCourt and deal with the person according to
law.(2)A drug court magistrate may take
account of the assessmentreport and the pre-sentence report
when sentencing the personfor the offence.Part 5Intensive drug rehabilitationordersDivision
1Preliminary17Application of pt 5(1)This
part applies if a person charged with a relevant offence(theoffender)
appears before a drug court magistrate—(a)on
proceedings adjourned under part 4; orPage 18Current as at 20 June 2013
Drug
Court Act 2000Part 5 Intensive drug rehabilitation
orders[s 18](b)ifexpresslyprovided
inrelationtoaprovisionofthispart, on other
proceedings.(2)However,ifthepersonappearsbeforethedrugcourtmagistrate on or after the relevant
day—(a)division 2, other than section 26(2),
does not apply tothe person; and(b)themagistratemustexercisethejurisdictionofaMagistrates Court and deal with the
person according tolaw.Division
2Making an order18Drug
court magistrate may make order only if convictionrecorded(1)Adrugcourtmagistratemaymakeanintensivedrugrehabilitationorderfortheoffenderforarelevantoffenceonly if the
magistrate records a conviction.(2)Subsection (1) also applies if the
proceedings for the offencearebeforethemagistrateotherthanonadjournmentunderpart
4.19Making of orderA drug court
magistrate may make an order (intensive
drugrehabilitationorder)fortheoffenderforanoffenceifsatisfied—(a)the
offence is a relevant offence; and(b)the
offender is an eligible person; and(c)the
offender has pleaded guilty to the offence; and(d)the
magistrate would, apart from this Act, sentence theoffender to a term of imprisonment;
and(e)the offence is—Current as at 20
June 2013Page 19
Drug
Court Act 2000Part 5 Intensive drug rehabilitation
orders[s 19](i)a
prescribed drug offence, or an offence against theDrugsMisuseAct1986thatmaybeprosecutedsummarily,forwhichtheoffendermaybeadequatelypunishedwithimprisonmentofnotmore than 3 years; or(ii)anotheroffenceforwhichtheoffendermaybeadequatelypunishedwithimprisonmentofnotmore than 4 years; and(f)the offender is not suffering from any
mental conditionthat could prevent the offender’s active
participation in arehabilitation program; and(g)themaximumnumberofactiveintensivedrugrehabilitationordersprescribedunderaregulationhasnot
been exceeded; and(h)thefacilitiestosuperviseandcontroltheoffender’sparticipationinarehabilitationprogramareavailableforallocationtotheoffenderunderguidelinesprescribed under
a regulation; and(i)therearereasonableprospectstheoffenderwouldsatisfactorilycomplywithanintensivedrugrehabilitationorderanditwouldbeotherwiseappropriate for
an intensive drug rehabilitation order tobe made, having
regard to all relevant matters including,for
example—(i)thepre-sentencereportandassessmentreportmentioned in section 16; and(ii)whetherachargeforanoffencethatcannotbedealtwithunderthisAct(otherthanadisqualifying offence) is pending in a
court againstthe offender, and if so, the nature and
seriousnessof the offence and when the charge is likely
to bedealt with.Page 20Current as at 20 June 2013
Drug
Court Act 2000Part 5 Intensive drug rehabilitation
orders[s 20]20Contents of order(1)If
the drug court magistrate decides to make an intensive drugrehabilitation order for the offender, the
order must contain—(a)an order—(i)sentencingtheoffendertoserveatermofimprisonment (theinitial
sentence); and(ii)suspending the whole of the term of
imprisonmentunder this Act; and(b)the
requirements of the order; and(c)arehabilitationprogramdecidedbythedrugcourtmagistrate for the offender.(2)For subsection (1)(a)(i), the
intensive drug rehabilitation ordermay contain an
order sentencing the offender to serve a termof imprisonment
of more than 3 years only if the prosecutingauthorityappearingbeforethecourtandtheoffenderhaveconsented to the offence being prosecuted
summarily on thegroundthatthedefendantwillbeadequatelypunishedonsummary conviction.21Delaying suspension of sentenceIfthedrugcourtmagistrateissatisfiedsufficientgroundsexist, the magistrate may—(a)direct that the commencement of the
suspension of thesentence be delayed for not more than 15
days; and(b)order that the offender be detained in
custody in a prisonuntil the earlier of the following
days—(i)the day the chief executive
(corrective services) isgivenareleaseauthorityintheapprovedformsigned by the
clerk of the court of a drug court;(ii)the
day the 15 day period ends.Current as at 20
June 2013Page 21
Drug
Court Act 2000Part 5 Intensive drug rehabilitation
orders[s 22]Example—Thedrugcourtmagistrateissatisfiedtheoffenderrequiresdetoxificationbutsuitablefacilitiesfordetoxificationarenotimmediately available.22Core conditions of intensive drug
rehabilitation orderAnintensivedrugrehabilitationorderissubjecttothefollowing core conditions—(a)the offender must not commit an
offence, in or outsideQueensland, during the period of the
order;(b)theoffendermustnotifyanauthorisedcorrectiveservices officer
of every change of the offender’s placeof residence or
employment within 2 business days afterthe change
happens;(c)the offender must not leave or stay
out of Queenslandwithoutanauthorisedcorrectiveservicesofficer’spermission;(d)theoffendermustcomplywitheveryreasonabledirectionofanauthorisedcorrectiveservicesofficer,includingadirectiontoappearbeforeadrugcourtmagistrate at a stated time and
place;(e)the offender must attend before a drug
court magistrateat the times and places stated in the
order.23Additional requirements of
order(1)Theintensivedrugrehabilitationordermayalsocontainrequirements that the offender—(a)make restitution, or pay compensation;
and(b)satisfactorily perform community
service of up to 240hoursfortheperiodstatedintheorder,asandwhendirected by an authorised corrective
services officer; and(c)do another thing
that a drug court magistrate considersmay help the
offender’s rehabilitation.Page 22Current as at 20
June 2013
Drug
Court Act 2000Part 5 Intensive drug rehabilitation
orders[s 23](2)Arequirementtomakerestitutionmaybemadeforproperty—(a)in
relation to which an offence was committed; or(b)takeninthecourseof,orinconnectionwith,thecommission of the offence.(3)A requirement to pay compensation may
be made—(a)to a person for any loss or
destruction of, damage causedto, or unlawful
interference with, property—(i)in
relation to which an offence was committed; or(ii)inthecourseof,orinconnectionwith,thecommission of the offence; and(b)for personal injury suffered by a
person, whether or notthe person is the victim against whom
an offence wascommitted, because of the commission of the
offence.(4)Indecidingwhethertorequiretheoffendertoperformcommunityserviceundersubsection(1)(b),thedrugcourtmagistrate must consider the number of hours
of communityservice the offender has outstanding under
another order andwhen the hours must be completed.(5)If the drug court magistrate decides
to require the offender toperform community service under
subsection (1)(b), the drugcourtmagistratemustconsiderwhethertheoffenderisinaresidential
rehabilitation facility and is able to complete thecommunity service.(6)ThePenalties and Sentences Act
1992, part 3, division 4, doesnotapplytorestitutionorcompensationunderanintensivedrug
rehabilitation order.(7)ThePenalties and Sentences Act 1992,
part 5, divisions 2 and3, do not apply to community service
under an intensive drugrehabilitation order.(8)A requirement under subsection (1) is
not a sentence withinthe meaning of thePenalties and
Sentences Act 1992, section4.Current as at 20 June 2013Page
23
Drug
Court Act 2000Part 5 Intensive drug rehabilitation
orders[s 24]24Contents and requirements of rehabilitation
program(1)Theintensivedrugrehabilitationordermust,asfaraspracticable,
state the details of the rehabilitation program theoffendermustundertake,including,forexample,thattheoffender must—(a)report to, or receive visits from, an
authorised correctiveservices officer; or(b)reportfordrugtestingtoanauthorisedcorrectiveservices
officer; or(c)attend vocational education and
employment courses; or(d)submittomedical,psychiatricorpsychologicaltreatment.(2)As
part of the medical, psychiatric or psychological treatment,the
offender may be required to remain at a place, and for atime, stated in the program.(3)The offender’s rehabilitation program
must also state that adrug court magistrate may, at any
time, commit the offendertoaprisonif,inthemagistrate’sopinion,thecommittalisnecessary to facilitate—(a)detoxification of the offender; or(b)assessmentoftheoffender’sparticipationintheprogram.(4)However, the offender must not be committed
to a prison fordetoxification unless the drug court
magistrate is satisfied noother suitable facilities are
immediately available.(5)If a drug court
magistrate commits an offender to prison tofacilitatedetoxification,theoffenderiscommittedtotheprison until the earliest of the
following—(a)22daysaftertheoffenderiscommittedtoprisonfordetoxification;(b)thechiefexecutive(correctiveservices)orchiefexecutive
(health) is satisfied the offender is detoxified;Page
24Current as at 20 June 2013
Drug
Court Act 2000Part 5 Intensive drug rehabilitation
orders[s 25](c)adrugcourtmagistrate,ontheoffender’sapplication,orders the
committal of the offender end.(6)If
an offender is committed to prison for an assessment of theoffender’sparticipationintheprogram,thecommittalmustnot
be for more than—(a)if the assessment is because the
offender has failed toattendonapersonorataplaceasstatedintherehabilitation program—30 days;
or(b)otherwise—15 days.(7)If a
drug court magistrate commits an offender to prison undersubsection(5)tofacilitatedetoxification,thedrugcourtmagistrate must order that after the
committal ends the personmustappearbeforeadrugcourtmagistrateatthetimeandplace stated.(8)If a
drug court magistrate commits an offender to prison undersubsection (6) for assessment, the drug
court magistrate muststate that after the committal ends
the offender must—(a)appear before a drug court magistrate
at the times andplaces stated; or(b)attend at another place at the times
stated.25Explaining orders(1)Before making an intensive drug
rehabilitation order, the drugcourt magistrate
must explain, or cause to be explained, to theoffender the
following matters—(a)that the intensive drug rehabilitation
order has 3 parts—(i)the sentence of imprisonment and the
suspensionof the sentence; and(ii)the
core conditions and additional requirements ofthe order;
and(iii)the
rehabilitation program;(b)the purpose and
effect of the order;Current as at 20 June 2013Page
25
Drug
Court Act 2000Part 5 Intensive drug rehabilitation
orders[s 26](c)what
may happen if the offender does not comply withthe
order;(d)that, subject to divisions 4 and 5,
the requirements of theorder or the rehabilitation program
may be amended or arehabilitationprogramterminatedonadrugcourtmagistrate’s own initiative or on
application by—(i)the offender; or(ii)an
authorised corrective services officer; or(iii)the
commissioner of the police service; or(iv)the
director of public prosecutions.(2)If
the offender is charged with a prescribed drug offence, themagistrate must also explain—(a)theoffenderwouldnormallybedealtwithintheSupreme Court
for the offence; and(b)themagistrateisdealingwiththeoffenderontheconditiontheoffendersuccessfullycompletetherehabilitation program; and(c)iftheoffenderdoesnotsuccessfullycompletetherehabilitation program, the offender
will be dealt with inthe Supreme Court for the
offence.(3)The explanation must be made in
language, or in a way, likelyto be readily
understood by the offender.26Offender to agree
to making or amending of order(1)Thedrugcourtmagistratemaymakeanintensivedrugrehabilitation order for the offender only
if the offender agreesto the order being made, including the
core conditions, andagrees to comply with it.(2)The drug court magistrate may amend
the requirements of anintensive drug rehabilitation order or
a rehabilitation programonly if the offender agrees to the
order being amended andagrees to comply with it.Page
26Current as at 20 June 2013
Drug
Court Act 2000Part 5 Intensive drug rehabilitation
orders[s 27]27Copy
of order to offender(1)The clerk of the
court of the drug court must give the offendera copy of the
intensive drug rehabilitation order.(2)A
copy of the core conditions must be included in, or attachedto,
the intensive drug rehabilitation order.(3)Theoffendermustacknowledgereceiptofthecopyoftheintensive drug
rehabilitation order in writing.(4)Until subsections (1) and (3) are complied
with, the offendermust remain in the custody of a police
officer.28Multiple offences(1)Under section 19, the drug court magistrate
(magistrate) maymake
more than 1 intensive drug rehabilitation order (order)for
the offender for more than 1 offence.(2)Ifthemagistratemakesanorderfortheoffenderinproceedings adjourned before the magistrate
under part 4, themagistrate may also make an order under
section 19 for theoffender in relation to another relevant
offence even thoughproceedingsfortheotheroffencearebeforethemagistrateother than on
adjournment under part 4.(3)However, in no
case may the magistrate make more than 1orderfortheoffenderformorethan1offenceifthetotalperiodofimprisonmentforwhichtheoffenderwouldbesentenced under section 20(a)(i) would
be more than 4 years.(4)Theordersmaybeincludedinasingleformoforderthatspecifieseachoffenceforwhichanintensivedrugrehabilitation order is made.Current as at 20 June 2013Page
27
Drug
Court Act 2000Part 5 Intensive drug rehabilitation
orders[s 29]Division
3Not making an order29Dealing with offenders if no intensive drug
rehabilitationorder madeIf the drug
court magistrate does not make an intensive drugrehabilitationorderfortheoffender,themagistratemustexercise the jurisdiction of a Magistrates
Court and deal withthe offender according to law.Division 4Rewards and
sanctions30Application for reward or
sanctionArewardorsanctionunderthisdivisionmaybegivenorimposedontheapplicationofanauthorisedcorrectiveservicesofficerortheoffenderoronthedrugcourtmagistrate’s own
initiative.31Rewards(1)Adrugcourtmagistratemaygivethefollowingkindsofrewardstotheoffenderifthemagistrateissatisfiedonthebalanceofprobabilitiestheoffenderissatisfactorilycomplyingwiththeoffender’sintensivedrugrehabilitationorder—(a)stated privileges;(b)adecreaseintheamountofanymonetarypenaltypayable, but not yet paid, by the offender
under section32;(c)adecreaseinthefrequencyofdrugtestingoftheoffender;(d)a decrease in the level of supervision
of the offender bya drug court magistrate or someone
else;(e)a change in—Page 28Current as at 20 June 2013
Drug
Court Act 2000Part 5 Intensive drug rehabilitation
orders[s 32](i)thenatureofthevocationaleducationandemployment courses the offender
attends; or(ii)the nature of
medical, psychiatric or psychologicaltreatment the
offender is undergoing;(f)adecreaseinthefrequencywithwhichtheoffendermust attend the
courses or treatment;(g)adecreaseintheamountofcommunityservicetheoffender must perform under the
order.(2)The magistrate may, if necessary,
amend the requirements oftheoffender’sintensivedrugrehabilitationorderortheoffender’s
rehabilitation program to give the reward.32Sanctions(1)A
drug court magistrate may impose the following kinds ofsanctions on the offender if the magistrate
is satisfied on thebalance of probabilities the offender is not
complying with theoffender’s intensive drug rehabilitation
order—(a)the withdrawal of stated
privileges;(b)theimpositionofamonetarypenaltypayabletotheclerk of the court of a drug
court;(c)an increase in the level of
supervision of the offender bya drug court
magistrate or someone else;(d)a
change in—(i)thenatureofthevocationaleducationandemployment courses the offender
attends; or(ii)the nature of
medical, psychiatric or psychologicaltreatment the
offender is undergoing;(e)anincreaseinthefrequencywithwhichtheoffendermust attend the
courses or treatment;(f)atermofimprisonmentforupto15daysforeachfailure to
comply with the order, but not so as to imposea term of more
than 22 days at any 1 hearing under thissection;Current as at 20 June 2013Page
29
Drug
Court Act 2000Part 5 Intensive drug rehabilitation
orders[s 33](g)anincreaseintheamountofcommunityservicetheoffender must perform, but—(i)notmorethan40hourscommunityserviceforeach
failure to comply with the order; and(ii)not
so as to impose more than 40 hours communityservice at any 1
hearing under this section; and(iii)not
so as to increase the total number of hours to beperformed under this section and under the
order tomore than 240 hours.(2)Indecidingwhethertoincreasetheamountofcommunityservice the
offender must perform under subsection (1)(g), thedrug
court magistrate must consider—(a)the
number of hours of community service the offenderhas
outstanding under another order and when the hoursmust
be completed; and(b)whethertheoffenderisinaresidentialrehabilitationfacility and is
able to complete the community service.(3)The
magistrate may, if necessary, amend the requirements oftheoffender’sintensivedrugrehabilitationorderortheoffender’s
rehabilitation program to give the sanction.(4)A
monetary penalty imposed under subsection (1)(b) is not apenalty within the meaning of thePenalties and Sentences Act1992, section
4.(5)Atermofimprisonmentimposedundersubsection(1)(f)isnotasentencewithinthemeaningofthePenaltiesandSentences Act 1992, section
4.Division 5Amending orders
and terminatingrehabilitation programs33Amending intensive drug rehabilitation
orders(1)Adrugcourtmagistratemay,onapplicationunderthisdivisionoronthemagistrate’sowninitiative,amendthePage 30Current as at 20
June 2013
Drug
Court Act 2000Part 5 Intensive drug rehabilitation
orders[s 34]requirementsofanintensivedrugrehabilitationorderorarehabilitation
program.(1A)Also, if a drug
court magistrate must conduct a court review inrelationtoanoffender,themagistratemustamendtherequirementsoftheoffender’sintensivedrugrehabilitationorder or
rehabilitation program if the magistrate is satisfied onthe
balance of probabilities the offender can, before 30 June2013—(a)comply with the amended intensive drug
rehabilitationorder and complete the amended
rehabilitation program;and(b)be
sentenced under section 36.(1B)However,adrugcourtmagistrateneednotamendtherequirementsofanintensivedrugrehabilitationorderorrehabilitationprogramifthemagistrateissatisfiedonthebalanceofprobabilitiestheoffendercan,before30June2013—(a)comply with the intensive drug
rehabilitation order andcomplete the rehabilitation program;
and(b)be sentenced under section 36.(2)If the magistrate amends the order,
the magistrate must givereasons.(3)This
section is subject to section 26(2).(4)In
this section—courtreviewmeansareviewbyadrugcourtrequiringtheattendance of an offender who is subject to
an intensive drugrehabilitation order.34Terminating rehabilitation programs(1)Adrugcourtmagistratemay,onapplicationunderthisdivisionoronthemagistrate’sowninitiative,terminatearehabilitation program decided for the
offender if—(a)theoffenderasksthemagistratetoterminatetherehabilitation program; orCurrent as at 20 June 2013Page
31
Drug
Court Act 2000Part 5 Intensive drug rehabilitation
orders[s 34](b)if
the magistrate proposes to amend the order—(i)theoffenderdoesnotagreetotheorderbeingamended; or(ii)theoffenderdoesnotagreetocomplywiththeamended order; or(c)theoffenderdoesnotattendbeforeadrugcourtmagistrateasrequiredundertheoffender’sintensivedrug
rehabilitation order or otherwise; or(d)theoffenderhasotherwisefailedtocomplywiththeintensive drug rehabilitation order;
or(e)themagistrateissatisfied,onthebalanceofprobabilities, there are not reasonable
prospects of theoffendersatisfactorilycomplyingwiththeoffender’sintensive drug
rehabilitation order; or(f)a warrant is
issued for the offender’s arrest under section40(1)(a).(1A)Also, a drug
court magistrate must terminate a rehabilitationprogram decided for an offender if the
magistrate is satisfiedonthebalanceofprobabilitiestherearenotreasonableprospects the
offender can, before 30 June 2013—(a)complywiththeintensivedrugrehabilitationorderorcomplete the rehabilitation program;
and(b)be sentenced under section 36.(2)Ifthemagistrateterminatestherehabilitationprogram,themagistrate must give reasons.(3)If the magistrate terminates the
rehabilitation program and theoffence in
relation to which the intensive drug rehabilitationorder for the offender was made is a
prescribed drug offence,the magistrate must—(a)order that the record of the
conviction for the offence berevoked;
andNote—For the effect of
not recording a conviction, see thePenalties
andSentences Act 1992, section
12.Page 32Current as at 20
June 2013
Drug
Court Act 2000Part 5 Intensive drug rehabilitation
orders[s 35](b)vacate the intensive drug rehabilitation
order; and(c)undertheJusticesAct1886,section113,committheoffender to the District Court for sentence,
even thoughthemagistratehasnotaddressedthedefendantasrequired under section 104(2).35Process for application to amend
intensive drugrehabilitation order or terminate
rehabilitation program(1)An application
under section 33 or 34 may be made by any ofthe following
persons—(a)the offender;(b)an
authorised corrective services officer;(c)a
prosecuting authority.(2)The application
may be made—(a)iftheoffenderisbeforeadrugcourtmagistrate—without notice; or(b)iftheoffenderisnotbeforeadrugcourtmagistrate—aftergivingnoticeintheapprovedformand
as required under subsection (3), (4), (5) or (6).(3)If an application is made by the
offender, notice must be givenby the court to
the chief executive (corrective services) and theprosecutor.(4)If
an application is made by an authorised corrective servicesofficer, notice must be given to the court,
the offender and theprosecutor.(5)Ifanapplicationismade
byaprosecutingauthority,noticemustbegiventothecourt,theoffenderandthechiefexecutive
(corrective services).(6)Notice under
subsection (3), (4) or (5) must be given to theperson at least
the day before the application is to be heardbefore the
magistrate.(7)In this section—Current as at 20
June 2013Page 33
Drug
Court Act 2000Part 5 Intensive drug rehabilitation
orders[s 36]prosecutormeanstheprosecutingauthoritythatappearedbefore the court when the intensive drug
rehabilitation orderwas made.36Final
sentence to be decided on completion ortermination of
rehabilitation program(1)Thissectionapplieswhenanoffender’srehabilitationprogram
ends—(a)iftheoffenceforwhichtheoffender’sintensivedrugrehabilitationorderwasmadewasaprescribeddrugoffence—becausetheoffenderhassuccessfullycompleted the
rehabilitation program under the order; or(b)iftheoffenceforwhichtheoffender’sintensivedrugrehabilitation
order was made was not a prescribed drugoffence—for any
reason.(2)The magistrate must, before 30 June
2013—(a)reconsider the offender’s initial
sentence; and(b)vacate the intensive drug
rehabilitation order; and(c)impose a final
sentence.(3)When reconsidering the initial
sentence, the magistrate mustconsider the
extent to which the offender participated in his orher
rehabilitation program, including, for example—(a)whetheranyrewardsorsanctionsweregiventoorimposed on the offender; and(b)if sanctions were imposed on the
offender that includedthe imposition of a term of
imprisonment under section32(1)(f), the number and length of the
terms imposed.(4)The final sentence may be—(a)foraprescribeddrugoffence—anysentencethatamagistratecouldimposeforanoffenceagainsttheDrugs Misuse Act 1986on
proceedings taken summarilyunder section 13
of that Act; orPage 34Current as at 20
June 2013
Drug
Court Act 2000Part 5 Intensive drug rehabilitation
orders[s 36A](b)foranyotherrelevantoffence—anysentencethatthemagistrate could have imposed for the
offence.Note to subsection (4)—See
also the Criminal Code, section 552H(1)(b) for an express
extensionof a drug court magistrate’s power to impose
a maximum penalty of 4years imprisonment on summary
conviction under section 552A, 552Bor 552BA of the
Code.(5)The magistrate must revokethe
conviction recorded for theoffence—(a)if thePenalties and
Sentences Act 1992, section 16 or 22applies;
or(b)otherwise, if the magistrate has a
discretion not to recorda conviction and decides not to record
a conviction.(6)Ifthemagistratesentencestheoffendertoserveatermofimprisonmentwithorwithoutsuspendingthesentence,thetermofimprisonmentmustnotbegreaterthanthetermimposed in the
initial sentence.(7)It is declared that in applying
thePenalties and Sentences Act1992, section 159A,
to a sentence for a term of imprisonmentimposedonanoffenderunderthissection,timespentincustody under this Act, other than under
section 32(1)(f), istaken to be imprisonment already
served under the sentence.Division 6General36ADrug court magistrate must consider
views of drug courtteam(1)Thissectionappliesifadrugcourtmagistrateismakingadecision(arelevantdecision)aboutanyofthefollowingmatters—(a)whetheranoffender’srehabilitationprogramshouldinclude medical,
psychiatric or psychological treatment(health treatment);Current as at 20 June 2013Page
35
Drug
Court Act 2000Part 5 Intensive drug rehabilitation
orders[s 36A](b)whatmattersshouldbeincludedinanoffender’srehabilitationprogramabouttheoffender’shealthtreatment;(c)wheretheoffendershouldbeplacedforhealthtreatment,including,forexample,inaresidentialrehabilitationfacility,anoutpatientfacilityorwithaparticular service provider;(d)howoftentheoffendershouldmeetwiththepersonsprovidingorsupervisingtheoffender’srehabilitationprogram,
including health treatment;(e)howoftentheoffendershouldappearbeforeadrugcourt
magistrate;(f)whether or not to give a reward to, or
impose a sanctionon, an offender;(g)whether or not an intensive drug
rehabilitation order or arehabilitationprogramforanoffendershouldbeamended;(h)whether or not an intensive drug
rehabilitation order foran offender should be
terminated.(2)Thedrugcourtmagistratemustconsidertheviewsofthemembersoftheoffender’sdrugcourtteaminmakingtherelevant decision.(3)In
this section—drug court team, for an
offender, means the persons who—(a)act
for an interested entity; and(b)attendahearingatwhicharelevantdecisionismadeabout the
offender.interested entitymeans any of the
following—(a)Legal Aid (Queensland);(b)a prosecuting authority;(c)thedepartmentinwhichtheCorrectiveServicesAct2000is
administered;Page 36Current as at 20
June 2013
Drug
Court Act 2000Part 5 Intensive drug rehabilitation
orders[s 37]Editor’s
note—Corrective Services Act 2000—see
theActs Interpretation Act1954,
section 14H andCorrective Services Act 2006.(d)the department
in which theHospital and Health BoardsAct
2011is administered.37Immunity from prosecution(1)Apersonisnotliabletobeprosecutedforanoffenceasaresult of an admission made by the
person—(a)for the purposes of deciding whether
the person—(i)is, or appears to be, an eligible
person; or(ii)is suitable for
rehabilitation; or(b)to someone responsible for the
person’s supervision ortreatment under this Act.(1A)To remove any
doubt, it is declared that subsection (1) doesnot prevent a
prosecution if there is evidence, other than theadmission or evidence obtained as a result
of the admission,implicating the accused.(2)The
admission, and any evidence obtained as a result of theadmission, is not admissible against the
person in proceedingsfor an offence.(3)However, this section does not apply
to—(a)a disqualifying offence; or(b)anindictableoffence,otherthananindictableoffencementioned in the Criminal Code, section
552A, 552B or552BA or theDrugs Misuse Act
1986, section 13 or 14;or(c)anoffencecommittedinconnectionwithanoffencementioned in
paragraph (a) or (b).Editor’s note—Criminal Code, section 552A (Charges of
indictable offences that mustbeheardanddecidedsummarilyonprosecutionelection),552B(ChargesofindictableoffencesthatmustbeheardanddecidedCurrent as at 20
June 2013Page 37
Drug
Court Act 2000Part 5 Intensive drug rehabilitation
orders[s 38]summarily unless
defendant elects for jury trial) or 552BA (Charges ofindictable offences that must be heard and
decided summarily) orDrugsMisuseAct1986,section13(Certainoffencesmaybedealtwithsummarily) or 14 (Other offences that
may be dealt with summarily ifno commercial
purpose alleged)38Random drug testingIfarehabilitationprogramunderanintensivedrugrehabilitation order includes a requirement
that the offendermust report for drug testing and states the
frequency for thetesting, an authorised corrective services
officer—(a)may decide when and where the offender
is to report;and(b)mayrequiretheoffendertoreportforfurtherrandomtesting as directed by the officer.39Disclosure of compliance and related
information(1)A prescribed person—(a)mustpromptlygivethechiefexecutive(correctiveservices),oradrugcourtmagistrate,anycomplianceinformationtheprescribedpersonhasabouttheoffender; and(b)mayenterinthedrugcourtdatabaseanycomplianceinformation or
related information the prescribed personhas about the
offender.(2)Subsection (1) applies despite any
Act, oath, rule of law orpracticethatprohibitsorrestrictsthedisclosureofinformation.(3)In
this section—complianceinformationmeansanyinformationabouttheoffender’s compliance with, or failure
to comply with—(a)therequirementsoftheoffender’sintensivedrugrehabilitation
order; or(b)the offender’s rehabilitation
program.Page 38Current as at 20
June 2013
Drug
Court Act 2000Part 5 Intensive drug rehabilitation
orders[s 39A]drugcourtdatabasemeansadatabaseforthedrugcourtdiversionprogramtowhichonlyaprescribedpersonhasaccess.informationincludes a
document.prescribedpersonmeansapersoninvolvedintheadministrationof,orwhoprovidesservicesinconnectionwith, an
offender’s rehabilitation program who is prescribedunder a regulation.relatedinformationmeansanyinformation,otherthancomplianceinformation,abouttheoffenderobtainedintheadministration
of, or in the provision of services in connectionwith, the offender’s rehabilitation
program.39ADisclosure of relevant
information(1)Apersonwhoisamemberofadrugcourtteamforanoffender may give another member of
the drug court team anyrelevant information the person has
about the offender.(2)In this section—compliance
informationsee section 39.drug court
team, for an offender, means any of the
followingpersons who are responsible for attending
the drug court andprovidingreportstothedrugcourtmagistrateabouttheperformanceoftheoffenderundertheintensivedrugrehabilitation order—(a)a
corrective services officer;(b)a
police officer;(c)a person employed for the purposes of
theDirectorofPublic Prosecutions Act 1984;(d)ahealthserviceemployeeundertheHospitalandHealth Boards Act 2011;(e)a Legal Aid employee under theLegal Aid QueenslandAct 1997.related informationsee
section 39.Current as at 20 June 2013Page
39
Drug
Court Act 2000Part 5 Intensive drug rehabilitation
orders[s 39B]relevant
informationmeans—(a)compliance information; or(b)related information; or(c)any other information prescribed under
a regulation forthis section;but does not
include information to which legal professionalprivilege
attaches.39BProtection from liability(1)This section applies if—(a)a person who is a health professional
gives an indicativeassessmentreporttothechiefexecutive(health)oradrug court
magistrate; or(b)apersonwhoisahealthprofessionalgivesanassessmentreporttothechiefexecutive(health)oradrug court
magistrate; or(c)a prescribed person gives the chief
executive (correctiveservices)oradrugcourtmagistratecomplianceinformation
under section 39; or(d)aprescribedpersonenterscomplianceinformationorrelatedinformationinthedrugcourtdatabaseundersection 39; or(e)a
person who is a member of a drug court team for anoffendergivesanothermemberoftheteamrelevantinformation
under section 39A.(2)Thepersonisnotliable,civilly,criminallyorunderanadministrativeprocess,forgivingthereport,orgivingorentering the information, honestly and on
reasonable grounds.(3)Also, merely because the person gives
the report, or gives orenters the information, the person can
not be held to have—(a)breached any
code of professional etiquette or ethics; or(b)departedfromacceptedstandardsofprofessionalconduct.Page
40Current as at 20 June 2013
Drug
Court Act 2000Part 5 Intensive drug rehabilitation
orders[s 39C](4)Without limiting subsections (2) and
(3)—(a)in a proceeding for defamation, the
person has a defenceofabsoluteprivilegeforpublishingthereportorinformation; and(b)if
the person would otherwise be required to maintainconfidentiality about the report or
information under anAct, oath or rule of law or practice,
the person—(i)does not contravene the Act, oath or
rule of law orpractice by giving the report or giving or
enteringinformation; and(ii)isnotliabletodisciplinaryactionforgivingthereport or giving or entering
information.39CProtection of personal information
about offenders(1)This section applies if a personal
information document aboutan offender is given to a drug
court.(2)The clerk of the court of a drug court
may give a copy of apersonalinformationdocumenttoaperson,otherthantheoffender to whom the document relates,
only if—(a)thepersonappliestothe
drugcourtforacopyofthedocument; and(b)the
court is satisfied the person has a sufficient interestin
the document; and(c)the court orders the person is to be
given a copy of thedocument.(3)Aregulationmayprovideforthestorageofpersonalinformationdocumentstoensuretheconfidentialityofinformation in the document.Example for subsection (3)—A regulation may provide that a
medical report about an offender, keptin the offender’s
file, is to be stored in a sealed envelope.(4)ThissectionappliesdespiteanyotherAct,includingtheJustices Act 1886, section
154.Current as at 20 June 2013Page
41
Drug
Court Act 2000Part 5 Intensive drug rehabilitation
orders[s 40](5)In
this section—personalinformationdocumentmeansadocumentthatisprescribed, under a regulation, to be
a document to which thissection applies.40Arrest warrants(1)A
drug court magistrate may issue a warrant for the offender’sarrest if the magistrate—(a)reasonablysuspectsanoffenderhasfailedtocomplywith his or her
rehabilitation program; or(b)terminates the
offender’s rehabilitation program.(2)Thewarrantauthorisesanypoliceofficertoarresttheoffenderandtobringtheoffenderbeforeadrugcourtmagistrate.(3)TheBailAct1980doesnotapplytoanoffenderwhoisarrested on the authority of a warrant
under this section.(4)If the warrant is issued under
subsection (1)(a), the drug courtmagistratemayremandtheoffenderincustodytoappearbeforeadrugcourtmagistrateifthedrugcourtmagistratedecides
to—(a)reservemakingadecisionaboutterminatingtheoffender’s rehabilitation program; or(b)terminatetheoffender’srehabilitationprogramundersection
34.(4A)Ifthewarrantisissuedundersubsection(1)(b)andtheoffence for
which the offender’s intensive drug rehabilitationorder was made was not a prescribed drug
offence, the drugcourtmagistratemayremandtheoffenderincustodytoappear before a drug court magistrate to be
sentenced undersection 36 before 30 June 2013.(5)The period for which an offender may
be remanded in custodyis as follows—(a)an
initial period of not more than 30 days;Page 42Current as at 20 June 2013
Drug
Court Act 2000Part 5 Intensive drug rehabilitation
orders[s 40A](b)a
further period or periods of not more than 8 days.(6)If the drug court magistrate remands
the offender in custody,thechiefexecutive(correctiveservices)mustensuretheperson appears before a drug court
magistrate to be dealt withas required by
the drug court magistrate.(7)Theclerkofthecourtofadrugcourtmayperformthemagistrate’s functions under subsection
(1).40ADealing with offender after arrest but
no final sentencedecided before 30 June 2013(1)This section applies if an offender is
arrested on the authorityof a warrant issued under section 40
and brought before a drugcourtmagistrateaftertherelevantdaybutcannotbesentenced under section 36 before 30
June 2013.(2)The drug court magistrate must—(a)order that the record of the
conviction for the offence berevoked;
andNote—For the effect of
not recording a conviction, see thePenalties
andSentences Act 1992, section
12.(b)vacate the offender’s intensive drug
rehabilitation order;and(c)deal
with the offender according to law.(3)The
magistrate—(a)may remand the offender in custody to
appear before amagistrate; or(b)mayreleasetheoffenderonbailtoappearbeforeamagistrate; or(c)if
either of the following applies must, under theJusticesAct1886,section113,committheoffendertotheDistrict Court for sentence—Current as at 20 June 2013Page
43
Drug
Court Act 2000Part 5 Intensive drug rehabilitation
orders[s 41](i)the
offence, in relation to which the intensive drugrehabilitation order for the offender was
made, is aprescribed drug offence;(ii)themagistrateissatisfied,undertheCriminalCode,section552D,theoffender,ifdealtwithundersubsection(2)(c),maynotbeadequatelypunished on
summary conviction.Note—Forthemaximumpenaltyforindictableoffencesdealtwith summarily,
see the Criminal Code, section 552H.(4)Subsection (3)(c) applies even though the
magistrate has notaddressedthedefendantasrequiredundertheJusticesAct1886, section
104(2).(5)Insentencinganoffendertowhomsubsection(3)(a)or(b)applies, the
magistrate must have regard to the initial sentencecontained in the offender’s intensive drug
rehabilitation order.(6)To remove any
doubt, it is declared that—(a)theBail Act 1980applies to an
offender who is arrestedon the authority of a warrant issued
under section 40 andto whom subsection (1) applies;
and(b)inapplyingthePenaltiesandSentencesAct1992,section 159A, to a sentence for a term of
imprisonmentimposed on an offender under this section,
time spent incustody, other than under section 32(1)(f),
is taken to beimprisonment already served under the
sentence.41Warrants of commitment(1)A drug court magistrate may issue a
warrant of commitmentfor the purposes of section 21 or
32(1)(f).(2)Theclerkofthecourtofadrugcourtmayperformthemagistrate’s functions under subsection
(1).42When no appeal(1)An
appeal does not lie against—Page 44Current as at 20 June 2013
Drug
Court Act 2000Part 6 General[s 42A](a)an initial sentence; or(b)a decision to do or not to do any of
the following—(i)remandapersontoappearbeforeadrugcourtmagistrate;(ii)makeanintensivedrugrehabilitationorderforaperson;(iii)amendanintensivedrugrehabilitationorderorterminate a rehabilitation program for
an offender;(iv)givearewardtoorimposeasanctiononanoffender.(2)Subsection (1) applies despite theJustices Act 1886, section222
and the Criminal Code, chapter 67.42AApplication of Penalties and Sentences Act
1992, s 188Toremoveanydoubt,itisdeclaredthatthePenaltiesandSentencesAct1992,section188appliestoinitialsentencesand
final sentences imposed under this Act.Part 6General43Regulation-making power(1)TheGovernorinCouncilmaymakeregulationsunderthisAct.(2)Aregulationprescribingthemaximumnumberofactiveintensivedrugrehabilitationordersmayprescribethemaximumnumberofactiveintensivedrugrehabilitationordersapplicableforpersonswhoresidewithinastatedlocality.(3)Aregulationmayprescribeguidelinesfordrugcourtsoraparticular drug
court.Current as at 20 June 2013Page
45
Drug
Court Act 2000Part 6 General[s 44](4)Withoutlimitingsubsection(3),aregulationmayprescribeguidelines for
drug courts or a particular drug court about thefollowing matters—(a)therequirementsofanintensivedrugrehabilitationorder;Example—the
maximum number of attendances ordinarily required beforea
drug court magistrate during a particular period(b)thecontentsandrequirementsofarehabilitationprogram;Example—themaximumnumberoftimesanoffendermustordinarilyreport for drug
testing during a particular period(c)the
ordinary requirements for successful completion of arehabilitation program.(5)Aregulationmayprescribetheminimumfrequencywithwhichoffendersmustbedrugtestedundertheoffenders’intensive drug
rehabilitation orders.44Approved
formsThe chief executive may approve forms for
this Act.45Expiry of ActThis Act expires
on 30 June 2013.Page 46Current as at 20
June 2013
Part
7Drug Court Act 2000Part 7
Transitional provisions[s 46A]Transitional
provisionsDivision 1Transitional
provision for DrugRehabilitation (North QueenslandCourt Diversion Initiative)Amendment Act 200246ATransitional provisions for Drug
Rehabilitation (NorthQueensland Court Diversion Initiative)
Amendment Act2002(1)Sections6and19,asinforceimmediatelybeforethecommencementofthissubsection,continuetoapplyinrelation to an intensive drug rehabilitation
order made beforethe commencement.(2)The
release under section 16(1) during the transitional periodof a
person on bail subject to a condition that the person reportto
persons at the times and places directed by a communitycorrectional officer is taken instead to
have been subject to acondition that the person report to
persons at the times andplaces directed by a corrective
services officer.(3)In this section—transitionalperiodmeanstheperiodbeginningon1July2001
and ending immediately before the commencement ofsubsection (2).Division
2Transitional provisions for DrugLegislation Amendment Act 200647Definition for div 2In
this division—commencementmeans the
commencement of this division.Current as at 20
June 2013Page 47
Drug
Court Act 2000Part 7 Transitional provisions[s
48]48References to ActIn an Act or
document, a reference to theDrug
Rehabilitation(CourtDiversion)Act2000may,ifthecontextpermits,betaken as a reference to this Act.49Transitional provision for
courtsAMagistrateCourtthatwas,immediatelybeforethecommencement, declared to be a pilot
program court is, on thecommencement, taken to be a drug
court.50Transitional provision for
magistratesAmagistratewho,immediatelybeforethecommencement,had been
allocated the functions of a pilot program magistrateis,onthecommencement,takentohavebeenallocatedthefunctions of a drug court magistrate.51Transitional provision for
proceedingsIf proceedings before a pilot program court
had been startedbut not finished before the commencement,
the proceedingsmaycontinueasiftheyhadbeenstartedafterthecommencement.Division
3Transitional provision for Civil andCriminal Jurisdiction Reform andModernisation Amendment Act201052Amendments apply
only to prosecutions commencedafter
commencement(1)Sections8and37,asamendedbytheCivilandCriminalJurisdiction
Reform and Modernisation Amendment Act 2010,applyinrelationtoachargeforanoffenceonlyifanPage 48Current as at 20 June 2013
Drug
Court Act 2000Part 7 Transitional provisions[s
52]originating step for the proceeding for the
charge is taken onor after the commencement of this
section.(2)For subsection (1), it does not matter
when the offence wascommitted.(3)In
this section—originating step, for a
proceeding, means—(a)the arrest of the defendant in the
proceeding; or(b)the making of a complaint under
theJustices Act 1886,section 42 in relation to the defendant in
the proceeding;or(c)the serving of a
notice to appear on the defendant in theproceeding under
thePolice Powers and ResponsibilitiesAct
2000, section 382.Current as at 20
June 2013Page 49
Drug
Court Act 2000ScheduleScheduleDictionarysection 5Page
50active intensive drug rehabilitation
ordermeans an intensivedrug
rehabilitation order other than—(a)an
intensive drug rehabilitation order, the rehabilitationprogramforwhichhasbeenterminatedundersection34; or(b)anintensivedrugrehabilitationorderthathasbeenvacated.appropriatelyqualified,forahealthprofessional,meanshavingthequalificationsorexperiencetocarryoutanindicative assessment or assessment of
a person.approved formsee section
44.assessment,ofaperson,meansanassessmentofthefollowingtohelpdecidetheperson’scapacitytoundertaketreatment—(a)the
person’s physical and mental health;(b)the
person’s past and present drug dependency and druguse;(c)the
treatment options appropriate for the person.assessment
reportsee section 16(3).authorisedcorrectiveservicesofficerseePenaltiesandSentences Act 1992, section
4A.chiefexecutive(health)meansthechiefexecutiveofthedepartmentinwhichtheHospitalandHealthBoardsAct2011is
administered.community servicemeans any
activity declared by the chiefexecutive(correctiveservices)tobecommunityservicefortheCorrectiveServicesAct2006orthePenaltiesandSentences Act 1992.community term of imprisonmentsee
section 7A.Current as at 20 June 2013
Drug
Court Act 2000Schedulecorecondition,ofanintensivedrugrehabilitationorder,means a condition mentioned in section
22.correctiveservicesofficerseetheCorrectiveServicesAct2006.corresponding provisionmeans a
corresponding provision ofa law of another State or the
Commonwealth.disqualifying offencesee section
7.drugmeans—(a)adangerousdrugwithinthemeaninggivenbytheDrugs Misuse Act
1986; or(b)another drug prescribed under a
regulation.drug courtmeans a
Magistrates Court declared to be a drugcourt under
section 9.drug court magistratemeans a
magistrate to whom functionsare allocated
under section 10(1).eligible personsee section
6.health professionalsee theHospital and Health Boards Act2011, schedule
2.health service facilitymeans a place at
which a health service,within the meaning of theHealth Services Act 1991, section
3,is provided.indicative
assessment, of a person, means an assessment as
towhether the person is drug dependent.indicative assessment reportsee
section 12B.initial sentencesee section
20(1)(a)(i).intensive drug rehabilitation ordersee
section 19.offendersee section
17.periodofimprisonmentmeanstheunbrokendurationofimprisonment that an offender is to
serve for 2 or more termsof imprisonment, whether—(a)ordered to be served concurrently or
cumulatively; orCurrent as at 20 June 2013Page
51
Drug
Court Act 2000Schedule(b)imposed at the same time or different
times;and includes a term of imprisonment.prescribed drug offencemeans an offence
under theDrugsMisuse Act
1986—(a)forwhichthemaximumpenaltyis20yearsimprisonment; and(b)that
is prescribed under a regulation.prisonmeans a prison within the meaning of
theCorrectiveServices Act
2006.prosecuting authoritymeans the commissioner of the policeservice or the director of public
prosecutions.referring magistratesee section
16(1).rehabilitation programmeans a
rehabilitation program underan intensive
drug rehabilitation order.relevant daymeans the day
section 12E commences.relevant offencesee section
8.termofimprisonmentmeansthedurationofimprisonmentimposed for a
single offence.Page 52Current as at 20
June 2013
Drug
Court Act 2000Endnotes3KeyKey to abbreviations in list of
legislation and annotationsKeyAIAamdamdtchdefdivexpgazhdginslapnotfdnumo in comorigpparaprecpresprevExplanation=Acts
Interpretation Act 1954=amended=amendment=chapter=definition=division=expires/expired=gazette=heading=inserted=lapsed=notified=numbered=order in council=omitted=original=page=paragraph=preceding=present=previousKey(prev)procprovptpubdR[X]RArelocrenumrep(retro)rvsschsdivSIASIRSLsubunnumExplanation=previously=proclamation=provision=part=published=Reprint No. [X]=Reprints Act 1992=relocated=renumbered=repealed=retrospectively=revised version=section=schedule=subdivision=Statutory Instruments Act 1992=Statutory Instruments Regulation
2002=subordinate legislation=substituted=unnumbered4Table of reprintsA new reprint of
the legislation is prepared by the Office of the Queensland
ParliamentaryCounsel each time a change to the
legislation takes effect.The notes column for this reprint
gives details of any discretionary editorial powers undertheReprints Act 1992used by the
Office of the Queensland Parliamentary Counsel inpreparing it. Section 5(c) and (d) of the
Act are not mentioned as they contain mandatoryrequirementsthatallamendmentsbeincludedandallnecessaryconsequentialamendments be
incorporated, whether of punctuation, numbering or another kind.
Furtherdetails of the use of any discretionary
editorial power noted in the table can be obtained bycontacting the Office of the Queensland
Parliamentary Counsel by telephone on 32370466 or email
legislation.queries@oqpc.qld.gov.au.From29January2013,allQueenslandreprintsaredatedandauthorisedbytheParliamentary Counsel. The previous
numbering system and distinctions between printedand
electronic reprints is not continued with the relevant details for
historical reprintsincluded in this table.ReprintNo.11A1BAmendments tonone2000
Act No. 462000 Act No. 58Effective13
June 200025 October 200017 November
2000Reprint date7 July
20008 November 200027 November
2000Page 54Current as at 20
June 2013
Drug
Court Act 2000EndnotesReprintNo.1C1D22A rv2B2C2D33A3B3C3DAmendments included2002
Act No. 232002 Act No. 412003 Act No.
552004 Act No. 432006 Act No.
82006 Act No. 292007 Act No.
372007 Act No. 372009 Act No.
342010 Act No. 422010 Act No.
262011 Act No. 32 (amd2012 Act No.
9)Effective19 July
200225 October 200218 September
20033 December 20043 July
200628 August 200628 September
20071 July 200829 March
201014 October 20101 November
20101 July 2012NotesCurrent as at20 June
2013Amendments included2013 Act No.
29Notes5List
of legislationDrug Court Act 2000 No. 3 (prev Drug
Rehabilitation (Court Diversion) Act 2000)date of assent 8
March 2000ss 1–2 commenced on date of assentremaining provisions commenced 13 June 2000
(2000 SL No. 103)exp 30 June 2013 (see s 45)amending legislation—Statute Law
(Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 2000 No. 46 ss 1, 3 schdate
of assent 25 October 2000commenced on date of assentJustice and Other Legislation (Miscellaneous
Provisions) Act 2000 No. 58 ss 1–2 schdate of assent 17
November 2000s 2 sch amdt 4 commenced on date of assent
(amdt could not be given effect)remaining
provisions commenced on date of assentCriminal Law
Amendment Act 2002 No. 23 ss 1, 2(3), pt 5date of assent 23
May 2002ss 1–2 commenced on date of assentremaining provisions commenced 19 July 2002
(2002 SL No. 157)Drug Rehabilitation (North Queensland Court
Diversion Initiative) Amendment Act2002 No.
41date of assent 12 September 2002ss
1–2 commenced on date of assentremaining
provisions commenced 25 October 2002 (2002 SL No. 279)Current as at 20 June 2013Page
55
Drug
Court Act 2000EndnotesEvidence
(Protection of Children) Amendment Act 2003 No. 55 pts 1, 9Adate
of assent 18 September 2003commenced on date of assentJustice and Other Legislation Amendment Act
2004 No. 43 pts 1, 9, s 3 schdate of assent 18
November 2004ss 1–2 commenced on date of assentremaining provisions commenced 3 December
2004 (2004 SL No. 263)Drug Legislation Amendment Act 2006
No. 8 pts 1–2date of assent 15 March 2006ss
1–2 commenced on date of assentremaining
provisions commenced 3 July 2006 (2006 SL No. 151)Corrective Services Act 2006 No. 29 ss 1,
2(2), 518 sch 3date of assent 1 June 2006ss
1–2 commenced on date of assents 518 sch 3 amdts
5, 6 and 8 (to the extent it amds defcorrective
services office)commenced 28 August 2006 (amdts could
not be given effect)remaining provisions commenced 28 August
2006 (2006 SL No. 213)Justice and Other Legislation
Amendment Act 2007 No. 37 pts 1, 11, s 51 schdate of assent 29
August 2007ss 1–2 commenced on date of assentss
52–61 commenced 1 July 2008 (2008 SL No. 197)remaining
provisions commenced 28 September 2007 (2007 SL No. 241)Juvenile Justice and Other Acts Amendment
Act 2009 No. 34 ss 1, 2(2), 45(1) sch pt 1amdt 15date
of assent 17 September 2009ss 1–2 commenced on date of
assentremaining provisions commenced 29 March 2010
(2010 SL No. 37)Civil and Criminal Jurisdiction Reform and
Modernisation Amendment Act 2010No. 26 pts 1,
7date of assent 13 August 2010ss
1–2 commenced on date of assentremaining
provisions commenced 1 November 2010 (2010 SL No. 236)Justice and Other Legislation Amendment Act
2010 No. 42 ss 1, 214 schdate of assent 14 October 2010commenced on date of assentHospital and Health Boards Act 2011 No. 32
ss 1–2, 332 sch 1 pt 2 (prev Health andHospitals
Network Act 2011) (this Act is amended, see amending
legislationbelow)date of assent 28
October 2011ss 1–2 commenced on date of assentremaining provisions commenced 1 July 2012
(2012 SL No. 61 item 3) (previousproclamation 2012
SL No. 23 item 3 was rep (2012 SL No. 61))amending
legislation—Page 56Current as at 20
June 2013
Drug
Court Act 2000EndnotesHealth and
Hospitals Network and Other Legislation Amendment Act 2012No.
9 ss 1–2(1), 47 (amends 2011 No. 32 above)date of assent 27
June 2012ss 1–2 commenced on date of assentremaining provisions commenced 1 July 2012
(see s 2(1))Industrial Relations (Transparency and
Accountability of Industrial Organisations)and Other Acts
Amendment Act 2013 No. 29 s 1, pt 2Edate of assent 20
June 2013commenced on date of assent6List of annotationsLong
titlesub 2006 No. 8 s 4Short
titles 1sub 2006 No. 8 s 5Objects of this
Acts 3sub 2006 No. 8 s 6Relationship
with Penalties and Sentences Act 1992s 4amd
2006 No. 8 s 7Notes in texts 4Ains
2002 No. 41 s 4Who is aneligible
persons 6amd 2002 No. 41 s 5; 2006 No. 8 s 8;
2006 No. 29 s 518 sch 3; 2007 No. 37 s52; 2009 No. 34 s
45(1) sch pt 1 amdt 15What is adisqualifying
offences 7amd 2000 No. 58 s 2 sch; 2002 No. 41 s
6; 2006 No. 8 s 9; 2010 No. 42 s 214schWhat
is acommunity term of imprisonments
7Aprev s 7A ins 2002 No. 41 s 7amd
2003 No. 55 s 51Bom 2006 No. 8 s 10pres s 7A (prev s
7B) ins 2002 No. 41 s 7renum 2006 No. 8 s 11What
is asuspended term of imprisonments
7Cins 2002 No. 41 s 7om 2006 No. 8 s
12What is arehabilitated
term of imprisonments 7Dins 2002 No. 41 s
7om 2006 No. 8 s 12What is arelevant offences 8amd
2010 No. 26 s 57Current as at 20 June 2013Page
57
Drug
Court Act 2000EndnotesPART 3—DRUG
COURTS AND DRUG COURT MAGISTRATESpt hdgsub
2006 No. 8 s 13Drug courtsprov hdgamd
2006 No. 8 s 14(1)s 9amd 2006 No. 8 s 14(2)–(4)Drug
court magistratesprov hdgamd 2006 No. 8 s
15(1)s 10amd 2006 No. 8 s 15(2)–(3)Functions, additional jurisdiction and
powers of drug court magistratesprov hdgamd
2006 No. 8 s 16s 11amd 2006 No. 8 s 16Other functions of drug court
magistratesprov hdgamd 2006 No. 8 s
17(1)s 12amd 2002 No. 41 s 3 sch; 2006 No. 8 s
17(1)–(2)PART 3A—INDICATIVE ASSESSMENT OF DRUG
DEPENDENCYpt hdgins 2006 No. 8 s
18Application of pt 3As 12Ains
2006 No. 8 s 18amd 2007 No. 37 s 53; 2013 No. 29 s
59KReferral for indicative assessments
12Bins 2006 No. 8 s 18amd 2013 No. 29 s
59LIndicative assessment reportss
12Cins 2006 No. 8 s 18amd 2007 No. 37 s
54Additional matters for indicative assessment
reports 12Dins 2006 No. 8 s
18Dealing with proceedings after submission of
indicative assessment reports 12Eins
2013 No. 29 s 59MApplication of pt 4s 13amd
2006 No. 8 s 19; 2007 No. 37 s 55; 2013 No. 29 s 59NReferral to be decided as soon as
practicables 14amd 2006 No. 8 s 20; 2007 No. 37 s
56Deciding whether to refer for
assessments 15amd 2002 No. 23 s 38; 2006 No. 8 s 21;
2007 No. 37 s 57; 2013 No. 29 s 59OReferral for
assessments 16amd 2002 No. 41 s 3 sch; 2006 No. 8 s
22; 2006 No. 29 s 518 sch 3 amdt 4(amdt 5 could not
be given effect); 2007 No. 37 s 58; 2013 No. 29 s 59PPage
58Current as at 20 June 2013
Drug
Court Act 2000EndnotesAssessment
reports 16Ains 2006 No. 8 s
23amd 2007 No. 37 s 59; 2013 No. 29 s
59QAdditional matters for assessment
reports 16Bins 2006 No. 8 s
23Dealing with proceedings after submission of
assessment report and pre-sentencereports
16Cins 2013 No. 29 s 59RApplication of
pt 5s 17amd 2006 No. 8 s 24; 2013 No. 29 s
59SDrug court magistrate may make order if
conviction recordedprov hdgamd 2006 No. 8 s
25(1)s 18amd 2006 No. 8 s 25(2)Making of orders 19amd
2002 No. 23 s 39; 2002 No. 41 s 8; 2006 No. 8 s 26Contents of orders 20amd
2006 No. 8 s 27Delaying suspension of sentences
21amd 2006 No. 8 s 28; 2007 No. 37 s 51
schCore conditions of intensive drug
rehabilitation orders 22sub 2006 No. 8 s
29Additional requirements of orders
23amd 2006 No. 8 s 30Contents and
requirements of rehabilitation programs 24amd
2006 No. 8 s 31Explaining orderss 25amd
2006 No. 8 s 32Offender to agree to making or amending of
orders 26amd 2006 No. 8 s 33Copy
of order to offenders 27amd 2006 No. 8 s
34Multiple offencess 28amd
2006 No. 8 s 35Dealing with offenders if no intensive drug
rehabilitation order mades 29amd 2006 No. 8 s
36; 2013 No. 29 s 59TApplication for reward or
sanctions 30amd 2006 No. 8 s 37Rewardss 31amd
2006 No. 8 s 38Current as at 20 June 2013Page
59
Drug
Court Act 2000EndnotesSanctionss
32amd 2006 No. 8 s 39Amending
intensive drug rehabilitation orderss 33amd
2006 No. 8 s 40; 2013 No. 29 s 59UTerminating
rehabilitation programss 34amd 2002 No. 23 s
40; 2002 No. 41 s 9; 2006 No. 8 s 41; 2007 No. 37 s 60;2013
No. 29 s 59VProcess for application to amend intensive
drug rehabilitation order or terminaterehabilitation
programs 35amd 2006 No. 8 s 42; 2006 No. 29 s 518
sch 3 (amdt could not be given effect)Inclusion of new
rehabilitation programs 35Ains 2002 No. 23 s
41amd 2006 No. 8 s 43om 2013 No. 29 s
59WFinal sentence to be decided on completion
or termination of rehabilitation programs 36amd
2002 No. 23 s 42; 2006 No. 8 s 44; 2010 No. 42 s 214 sch; 2010 No.
26 s58; 2013 No. 29 s 59XDrug court
magistrate must consider views of drug court teams
36Ains 2006 No. 8 s 45amd 2011 No. 32 s
332 sch 1 pt 2 (amd 2012 No. 9 s 47)Immunity from
prosecutions 37amd 2000 No. 58 s 2 sch; 2010 No. 26 s
59Disclosure of compliance and related
informationprov hdgsub 2002 No. 23 s
43(1)s 39amd 2002 No. 23 s 43(2)–(4); 2006 No.
8 s 46; 2006 No. 29 s 518 sch 3 (amdtcould not be
given effect)Disclosure of relevant informations
39Ains 2006 No. 8 s 47amd 2011 No. 32 s
332 sch 1 pt 2 (amd 2012 No. 9 s 47)Protection from
liabilitys 39Bins 2006 No. 8 s
47Protection of personal information about
offenderss 39Cins 2006 No. 8 s
47Arrest warrantss 40amd
2006 No. 8 s 48; 2013 No. 29 s 59YDealing with
offender after arrest but no final sentence decided before 30 June
2013s 40Ains 2013 No. 29 s
59ZWarrants of commitments 41amd
2006 No. 8 s 49Page 60Current as at 20
June 2013
Drug
Court Act 2000EndnotesWhen no
appeals 42amd 2006 No. 8 s 50Application of Penalties and Sentences Act
1992, s 188s 42Ains 2006 No. 8 s
51Regulation-making powers 43amd
2002 No. 23 s 44; 2006 No. 8 s 52Expiry of
Acts 45prev s 45 om 2006 No. 8 s 53pres
s 45 ins 2013 No. 29 s 59ZAReport on Act’s
operation by pilot program magistrates 46om
2006 No. 8 s 53PART 7—TRANSITIONAL PROVISIONSpt
hdgins 2006 No. 8 s 54Division1—TransitionalprovisionforDrugRehabilitation(NorthQueenslandCourt Diversion
Initiative) Amendment Act 2002div hdgins
2006 No. 8 s 54Transitional provisions for Drug
Rehabilitation (North Queensland Court DiversionInitiative) Amendment Act 2002s
46Ains 2002 No. 41 s 10Division
2—Transitional provisions for Drug Legislation Amendment Act
2006div hdgins 2006 No. 8 s
55amd 2007 No. 37 s 51 schDefinition for
div 2prov hdgsub 2006 No. 8 s
56s 47amd 2002 No. 23 s 45AIA s
20A applies to s 47(2) (see s 47(3))amd 2004 No. 43 s
43sub 2006 No. 8 s 56References to
Acts 48ins 2006 No. 8 s 56Transitional provision for courtss
49ins 2006 No. 8 s 56Transitional
provision for magistratess 50ins 2006 No. 8 s
56Transitional provision for
proceedingss 51ins 2006 No. 8 s 56Division 3—Transitional provision for Civil
and Criminal Jurisdiction Reform andModernisation
Amendment Act 2010div 3 (s 52)ins 2010 No. 26 s
60Current as at 20 June 2013Page
61
Drug
Court Act 2000EndnotesSCHEDULE—DICTIONARYdefactive intensive drug rehabilitation
orderins 2002 No. 23 s 46defappropriately qualifiedins 2006 No. 8 s
57(2)defassessmentins 2006 No. 8 s
57(2)defassessment reportins 2006 No. 8 s
57(2)defchief executive (health)ins
2006 No. 8 s 57(2)amd 2011 No. 32 s 332 sch 1 pt 2 (amd 2012
No. 9 s 47)defcommunity correctional officerom
2002 No. 41 s 3 schdefcommunity serviceamd 2002 No. 41 s
3 sch; 2006 No. 29 s 518 sch 3defcommunity term of imprisonmentins
2002 No. 41 s 3 schamd 2006 No. 8 s 57(3)defcore
conditionins 2006 No. 8 s 57(2)defcorrective services’ chief executiveamd
2002 No. 41 s 3 schom 2006 No. 8 s 57(1); 2006 No. 29 s 518 sch
3 (amdt could not be giveneffect)defcorrective services officeins
2002 No. 41 s 3 schom 2006 No. 8 s 57(1)amd 2006 No. 29 s
518 sch 3 (amdt could not be given effect)defcorrective services officerins
2002 No. 41 s 3 schamd 2006 No. 29 s 518 sch 3defcorresponding provisionins
2002 No. 41 s 3 schdefdisqualifying term of
imprisonmentins 2002 No. 41 s 3 schom 2006 No. 8 s
57(1)defdrug courtins 2006 No. 8 s
57(2)defdrug court magistrateins
2006 No. 8 s 57(2)defhealth professionalins
2006 No. 8 s 57(2)amd 2011 No. 32 s 332 sch 1 pt 2 (amd 2012
No. ?? s 47)defhealth service facilityins
2006 No. 8 s 57(2)defindicative assessmentins
2006 No. 8 s 57(2)defindicative assessment reportins
2006 No. 8 s 57(2)definitial sentenceamd 2010 No. 42 s
214 schdefoffenderamd 2000 No. 46 s
3 sch; 2000 No. 58 s 2 sch (amdt could not begiven
effect)defpilot program courtom
2006 No. 8 s 57(1)defpilot program magistrateom
2006 No. 8 s 57(1)defprisonamd 2002 No. 41 s
3 sch; 2006 No. 29 s 518 sch 3defprosecuting authorityins 2006 No. 8 s
57(2)defreferring magistrateins
2007 No. 37 s 61defrehabilitated term of
imprisonmentins 2002 No. 41 s 3 schom 2006 No. 8 s
57(1)defrelevant dayins 2013 No. 29 s
59ZBdefsuspended term of imprisonmentins
2002 No. 41 s 3 schom 2006 No. 8 s 57(1)Page 62Current as at 20 June 2013