Reprint noteThe table of reprints in the endnotes of this version has been updated to reflect the current style.This version was produced on 9 July 2015.Law Reform Act 1995An Act to abolish the rule of common employment, to consolidate provisions reforming the law and to make provision for other reforms, and for other purposesLong title amd 1995 No. 58s 4sch 1; 1996 No. 79s 65Part 1Preliminarypt hdg ins 1995 No. 58s 4sch 11Short titleThis Act may be cited as the Law Reform Act 1995.s 1 sub 1995 No. 58s 4sch 12Act is, in part, a consolidation(1)This Act, as in force at the commencement of this section, is, in part, a consolidation of provisions of the Law Reform (Abolition of the Rule of Common Employment) Act 1951 (the existing provisions) and provisions relocated from the following Acts (the relocated provisions)—

•Law Reform (Tortfeasors Contribution, Contributory Negligence, and Division of Chattels) Act 1952

•Law Reform (Husband and Wife) Act 1968

•Voluntary Aid in Emergency Act 1973.

(2)The Act is also a consolidation of provisions of the law about the age of majority and the legal capacity of persons whose relationship is husband and wife.(3)To remove any doubt, it is declared that the relocated provisions were not re-enacted by the Statute Law Revision Act (No. 2) 1995, but merely moved (without re-enactment) from the Acts in which they were enacted to this Act.(4)Without limiting subsections (1) and (3) and to further remove any doubt, it is also declared that the relocation to this Act of the relocated provisions did not impliedly repeal or amend, or otherwise affect the operation of, the existing provisions, the relocated provisions or the provisions of any other law and, in particular, did not affect the meaning or effect that the existing or relocated provisions, or the provisions of the other law, had because of the respective times when they were enacted.(5)In addition, it is declared that the relocation did not—

(a)affect any jurisdiction or power of a court or judge; or

(b)affect any principle or rule of law or equity; or

(c)affect any right, privilege or liability; or

(d)revive anything not existing or in force.

s 2 ins 1995 No. 58 s 4 sch 1amd 1996 No. 79 s 66; 2002 No. 74 s 90 schPart 2Abolition of rule of common employmentpt hdg ins 1995 No. 58 s 4 sch 13Defence of common employment abolished(1)It shall not be a defence to an employer who is sued in respect of any injury or damage caused by the wrongful act, neglect, or default of a person employed by him or her, that that person was at the time the injury or damage was caused in common employment with the person suffering that injury or damage.(2)Any provision contained in a contract of service or apprenticeship, or in an agreement collateral thereto (including a contract or agreement entered into before the commencement of this section), shall be void in so far as it would have the effect of excluding or limiting any liability of the employer in respect of personal injuries caused to the person employed or apprenticed by the wrongful act, neglect, or default of any persons in common employment with him or her.s 3 amd 1995 No. 58s 4sch 14Application to CrownThis part binds the Crown and instrumentalities of the Crown.s 4 amd 1995 No. 58s 4sch 1Part 3Tortfeasors contribution and contributory negligencept hdg ins 1995 No. 58s 4sch 1Division 1Preliminarydiv hdg ins 1995 No. 58s 4sch 1sub 2003 No. 16s 111sch 14AApplication of partThis part applies subject to the Civil Liability Act 2003.s 4A ins 2003 No. 16s 111sch 15Definitions for pt 3In this part—court means, in relation to any claim, the court or arbitrator by or before whom the claim falls to be determined.damage includes loss of life and personal injury.dependant means any person for whose benefit an action could be brought under the Civil Proceedings Act 2011, part 10.def dependant amd 2011 No. 45s 161fault ...def fault amd 1995 No. 58s 4sch 1om 2001 No. 65s 4(1)wrong means an act or omission that—

(a)gives rise to a liability in tort for which a defence of contributory negligence is available at common law; or

(b)amounts to a breach of a contractual duty of care that is concurrent and coextensive with a duty of care in tort.

def wrong ins 2001 No. 65s 4(2)s 5 (prev 1952 1 Eliz 2 No. 42 s 4) amd 1995 No. 58s 4sch 1reloc 1995 No. 58s 4sch 1Division 2Proceedings against, and contribution between, tortfeasorsdiv hdg ins 1995 No. 58s 4sch 16Proceedings against, and contribution between, joint and several tortfeasorsWhere damage is suffered by any person as a result of a tort (whether a crime or not) the following apply—

(a)judgment recovered against any tortfeasor liable in respect of that damage shall not be a bar to an action against any other person who would, if sued, have been liable as a joint tortfeasor in respect of the same damage;

(b)if more than 1 action is brought in respect of that damage by or on behalf of the person by whom it was suffered, or for the benefit of the estate, or of the dependants of that person, against tortfeasors liable in respect of the damage (whether as joint tortfeasors or otherwise)—the sums recoverable under the judgments given in those actions by way of damages shall not in the aggregate exceed the amount of the damages awarded by the judgment first given; and in any of those actions, other than that in which judgment is first given, the plaintiff shall not be entitled to costs unless the court is of opinion that there was reasonable ground for bringing the action;

(c)any tortfeasor liable in respect of that damage may recover contribution from any other tortfeasor who is, or would if sued have been, liable in respect of the same damage, whether as a joint tortfeasor or otherwise, so, however, that no person shall be entitled to recover contribution under this section from any person entitled to be indemnified by the person in respect of the liability in respect of which the contribution is sought.

s 6 (prev 1952 1 Eliz 2 No. 42 s 5) amd 1994 No. 85s 12 schreloc 1995 No. 58s 4sch 1amd 2010 No. 42s 214 sch; 2011 No. 45s 1627Amount of contribution and power of the courtIn any proceedings for contribution under this division the amount of the contribution recoverable from any person shall be such as may be found by the court to be just and equitable having regard to the extent of that person’s responsibility for the damage; and the court shall have power to exempt any person from liability to make contribution, or to direct that the contribution to be recovered from any person shall amount to a complete indemnity.s 7 (prev 1952 1 Eliz 2 No. 42 s 6) amd 1995 No. 58s 4sch 1reloc 1995 No. 58s 4sch 18Additional definitions for div 2In this division—judgment first given means—

(a)for a judgment reversed on appeal—the first judgment given that is not later reversed on appeal; or

(b)for a judgment varied on appeal—the judgment as varied.

s 8 (prev 1952 1 Eliz 2 No. 42 s 8) amd 1994 No. 85s 12 schsub 1995 No. 58s 4sch 1reloc 1995 No. 58s 4sch 1def child om 2011 No. 45s 163def parent om 2011 No. 45s 163def spouse sub 2002 No. 74s 90 schom 2011 No. 45s 1639Application of division(1)This division does not—

(a)apply to a tort committed before 12 January 1953; orEditor’s note—This is the commencement date of the Law Reform (Tortfeasors Contribution, Contributory Negligence, and Division of Chattels) Act 1952.

(b)affect a criminal prosecution against a person; or

(c)render enforceable an agreement for indemnity that would not otherwise have been enforceable.

(2)However, subsection (1)(c) does not apply to a claim for contribution or any liability arising from that claim if—

(a)the Law Reform (Tortfeasors Contribution, Contributory Negligence, and Division of Chattels) Act 1952, repealed section 7, would have applied to the claim apart from its repeal; and

(b)the act or omission giving rise to the claim happened before 1 June 1968.Editor’s note—This is the commencement date of the Law Reform (Husband and Wife) Act 1968.

s 9 (prev 1952 1 Eliz 2 No. 42 s 9) sub 1995 No. 58s 4sch 1reloc 1995 No. 58s 4sch 1Division 3Contributory negligencediv hdg ins 1995 No. 58s 4sch 110Apportionment of liability in case of contributory negligence(1)If a person (the claimant) suffers damage partly because of the claimant’s failure to take reasonable care (contributory negligence) and partly because of the wrong of someone else—

(a)a claim in relation to the damage is not defeated because of the claimant’s contributory negligence; and

(b)the damages recoverable for the wrong are to be reduced to the extent the court considers just and equitable having regard to the claimant’s share in the responsibility for the damage.

(2)Subsection (1) does not operate to defeat any defence arising under a contract.(2A)If a contract or enactment providing for the limitation of liability applies to the claim, the amount of damages recoverable by the claimant because of subsection (1) is not to exceed the maximum limit applying to the claim.(3)Where damages are recoverable by any person by virtue of subsection (1) subject to such reduction as is therein mentioned, the court shall find and record the total damages which would have been recoverable if the claimant had not been guilty of contributory negligence.(4)Division 2 shall apply in any case where 2 or more persons are liable or would, if they had all been sued, be liable by virtue of subsection (1) in respect of the damage suffered by any person.(5)Where any person dies as the result partly of his or her own failure to take reasonable care and partly of the wrong of any other person or persons, and accordingly if an action were brought for the benefit of the estate under the Succession Act 1981, section 66 the damages recoverable would be reduced under subsection (1), any damages recoverable in an action brought for the benefit of the dependants of that person under the Civil Proceedings Act 2011, part 10 must be reduced to a proportionate extent.Editor’s note—Civil Proceedings Act 2011, part 10 (Wrongful death proceedings)(6)Where, in any case to which subsection (1) applies, one of the persons responsible for the damage avoids liability to any other such person or the person’s personal representative by pleading the Limitation of Actions Act 1974 or another Act limiting the time within which proceedings may be taken, the person shall not be entitled to recover any damages or contributions from that other person or representative by virtue of the said subsection.(7)Where any case to which subsection (1) applies is tried with a jury, the jury shall determine the total damages which would have been recoverable if the claimant had not been guilty of contributory negligence and the extent to which those damages are to be reduced.s 10 (prev 1952 1 Eliz 2 No. 42 s 10) amd 1995 No. 58s 4sch 1reloc 1995 No. 58s 4sch 1amd 2001 No. 65s 5; 2011 No. 45s 16411Application of divisionThis division does not apply to a case if the acts or omissions giving rise to the claim happened before 12 January 1953.Editor’s note—This is the commencement date of the Law Reform (Tortfeasors Contribution, Contributory Negligence, and Division of Chattels) Act 1952.s 11 (prev 1952 1 Eliz 2 No. 42 s 12) sub 1995 No. 58s 4sch 1reloc 1995 No. 58s 4sch 1Part 4Civil remedies between persons whose relationship is husband and wifept hdg ins 1995 No. 58s 4sch 1sub 2002 No. 74s 90 sch12Actions in tort between husband and wife(1)Subject to the provisions of this section, each of the parties to a marriage shall have the like right of action in tort against the other as if they were not married.(2)Where an action in tort is brought by one of the parties to a marriage against the other during the subsistence of the marriage, the court may stay the action if it appears that no substantial benefit would accrue to either party from the continuation of the proceedings.(3)In subsection (1)—parties to a marriage includes reference to persons who were parties to a marriage that has been annulled or dissolved.s 12 (prev 1968 No. 15s 2) amd 1989 No. 81s 4; 1995 No. 58s 4sch 1reloc 1995 No. 58s 4sch 113Spouse’s remedy for loss or impairment of consortium(1)This section applies if a person causes injury to another by wrongful act, neglect or default, whether or not the injury results in death.(2)The person is liable in damages to the injured person’s spouse for loss or injury suffered by the spouse because of the loss or impairment of consortium.(3)The damages must be assessed in the same way as in a claim by a husband for damages in tort for loss or impairment of consortium.(4)A husband can only recover the damages mentioned in this section under either the common law or this section but not both.s 13 (prev 1968 No. 15s 3) sub 1989 No. 81s 5reloc 1995 No. 58s 4sch 1sub 2010 No. 9s 2214Application of partThis part shall not be construed to confer a right of action in respect of a wrongful act, neglect or default that occurred—

(a)before 1 June 1968, where the application of section 12 is in question; or

(b)before 1 January 1985, where the application of section 13 is in question.

s 14 prev s 14 ins 1995 No. 58s 4sch 1pres s 14 (prev 1968 No. 15s 4) sub 1989 No. 81s 6amd 1995 No. 58s 4sch 1reloc 1995 No. 58s 4sch 1amd 2010 No. 42s 214 schPart 5Voluntary aid in emergencypt hdg ins 1995 No. 58s 4sch 115Definitions for pt 5In this part—injured person includes a person suffering or apparently suffering from an illness.medical practitioner ...def medical practitioner sub 2001 No. 7s 302sch 2om 2010 No. 14s 124 schnurse means a person registered under the Health Practitioner Regulation National Law to practise in the nursing and midwifery profession as a nurse, other than as a student.def nurse sub 2010 No. 14s 124 schs 15 (prev 1973 No. 56s 2) amd 1995 No. 58s 4sch 1reloc 1995 No. 58s 4sch 116Protection of medical practitioners and nurses and other prescribed personsLiability at law shall not attach to a medical practitioner, nurse or other person prescribed under a regulation in respect of an act done or omitted in the course of rendering medical care, aid or assistance to an injured person in circumstances of emergency—

(a)at or near the scene of the incident or other occurrence constituting the emergency; or

(b)while the injured person is being transported from the scene of the incident or other occurrence constituting the emergency to a hospital or other place at which adequate medical care is available;

if—

(c)the act is done or omitted in good faith and without gross negligence; and

(d)the services are performed without fee or reward or expectation of fee or reward.

s 16 (prev 1973 No. 56s 3) amd 1995 No. 58s 4sch 1reloc 1995 No. 58s 4sch 1amd 1997 No. 82s 3 sch; 2010 No. 42s 214 schPart 6Age of majoritypt hdg ins 1995 No. 58s 4sch 117What is age of majorityThe age of majority is 18 years.s 17 ins 1995 No. 58s 4sch 1Part 7Legal capacity of persons whose relationship is husband and wifept hdg ins 1995 No. 58s 4sch 1sub 2002 No. 74s 90 sch18Capacity(1)A married person has a legal personality that is independent, separate and distinct from the legal personality of the person’s husband or wife.(2)A married person has the same legal capacity that the person would have if the person were unmarried.s 18 ins 1995 No. 58s 4sch 1amd 2002 No. 74s 90 schPart 8Attachment of wagespt hdg ins 1996 No. 79s 6818AWages of public service employees may be attached(1)A court may, in a proceeding, order the attachment or charging of the salary or wages of a public service employee or other employee of the State to satisfy a debt, liability, action or other amount ordered by the court to be paid.(2)Also, the registrar of a court may order the attachment or charging of the salary or wages of a public service employee or other employee of the State to satisfy a debt, liability, action or other amount ordered by the court to be paid.(3)This section has effect despite any other Act or rule of law to the contrary.s 18A ins 1996 No. 79s 68amd 2000 No. 58s 2 schPart 9Miscellaneouspt hdg (prev pt 8 hdg) ins 1995 No. 58s 4sch 1renum 1996 No. 79s 6719Regulation-making powerThe Governor in Council may make regulations under this Act.s 19 ins 1995 No. 58s 4sch 120References to certain Acts and provisions(1)In an Act or document, a reference to any of the following Acts may, if the context permits, be taken to be a reference to this Act, and a reference (whether express or implied) to a provision of any of the following Acts that was located to this Act may, if the context permits, be taken to be a reference to the corresponding provision of this Act—

•Law Reform (Tortfeasors Contribution, Contributory Negligence, and Division of Chattels) Act 1952

•Law Reform (Husband and Wife) Act 1968

•Voluntary Aid in Emergency Act 1973.

(2)In an Act or document, a reference to the Law Reform (Abolition of the Rule of Common Employment) Act 1951 is a reference to this Act.s 20 ins 1995 No. 58s 4sch 1Part 10Transitional provision for Law Reform (Contributory Negligence) Amendment Act 2001pt hdg ins 2001 No. 65s 621Amendments about contributory negligence to have retrospective effect(1)The provisions of part 3, divisions 1 and 3 apply to a wrong that happened before the commencement as if the provisions, in their form as amended by the amending Act, had been in force when the wrong happened.(2)However, the provisions, as in force before the commencement, continue to apply to a wrong if any of the following apply—

(a)the wrong relates to a WorkCover damages injury sustained before 1 July 2001 for which final relief has not been granted by a court before the commencement;

(b)a proceeding about the wrong—

(i)was started before the commencement; and

(ii)final relief has not been granted by the court before the commencement;

(c)a court has, before the commencement, granted final relief for the wrong;

(d)the persons responsible for the damage have, before the commencement, entered into an agreement to settle claims arising from the wrong, including an agreement about liability only.

(3)Subsection (2)(a) applies whether or not a proceeding has been started about the wrong.(4)For a proceeding for subsection (2)(a) or (b), any rule, regulation or other law that would have been applicable to the proceeding had the amending Act not been enacted continues to apply to the proceeding as if the amending Act had not been enacted.(5)In this section—amending Act means the Law Reform (Contributory Negligence) Amendment Act 2001.commencement means the commencement of this section.final relief, for a wrong, means a judgment or decision about the wrong, including a judgment or decision about liability only, whether or not an appeal has been made against the judgment or decision.proceeding means a proceeding before a court.WorkCover damages injury means an injury within the meaning of the WorkCover Queensland Act 1996 for which the injured person has an entitlement to damages under that Act.s 21 ins 2001 No. 65 s 6