An Act to amend the Civil Liability Act 2003 to allow institutions to potentially be held vicariously liable for claims for the abuse of children under their care, supervision, control or authority if the abuse is perpetrated by persons not employed by the institutions but in relationships akin to employment by the institutions, and for other particular purposesThe Parliament of Queensland enacts—1Short titleThis Act may be cited as the Civil Liability (Holding Institutions Accountable for Child Abuse) Amendment Act 2026.2Act amendedThis Act amends the Civil Liability Act 2003.3Amendment of s 33A (Definitions for part)Section 33A, definition associated with, ‘section 33C’—omit, insert—sections 33C and 33IB4Insertion of new ch 2, pt 2A, div 3AChapter 2, part 2A—insert—Division 3ALiability of institutions for abuse by persons in relationship akin to employment33IA Definition for divisionIn this division, other than section 33IC, a reference to an abuse claim includes a reference to a purported abuse claim mentioned in section 33IC(2).33IB Extension of class of person associated with an institutionA person is taken to be, or to have been, associated with an institution under this part if the person is, or was, in a relationship with the institution akin to being employed by the institution.33IC Declarations about liability of institution for person akin to employee(1)It is declared that an institution is not prevented from being held vicariously liable for an abuse claim arising from the abuse of a child by a person associated with the institution only because the person—

(a)is not employed by the institution; but

(b)is, instead, in a relationship with the institution akin to being employed by the institution.

(2)It is also declared that an institution has never been prevented from being held vicariously liable for a purported abuse claim that arose from the abuse of a child by a person associated with the institution only because the person—

(a)was not employed by the institution; but

(b)was, instead, in a relationship with the institution akin to being employed by the institution.

(3)To remove any doubt, it is further declared that a purported abuse claim mentioned in subsection (2) is taken to be, and always to have been, an abuse claim under this part.(4)Subsections (1) and (2) apply in relation to a cause of action to which an abuse claim or purported abuse claim relates whether the cause of action accrued before or after the commencement.(5)However, this section does not apply in relation to a cause of action for an abuse claim or purported abuse claim that was settled before 13 November 2024.33ID Application of Limitation of Actions Act 1974, section 11ATo remove any doubt, it is declared the Limitation of Actions Act 1974, section 11A applies in relation to an action for damages for an abuse claim in relation to which section 33IC applies.Note—The Limitation of Actions Act 1974, section 11A provides for an action for damages relating to the personal injury of a person resulting from the abuse of the person when the person was a child to be brought at any time and not be subject to a limitation period under an Act or law or rule of law.33IE Bringing action on previously settled right of action(1)This section applies in relation to a right of action for an abuse claim (a previously settled right of action) if—

(a)section 33IC applies in relation to the abuse claim; and

(b)the right of action was settled before the commencement but after 12 November 2024.

(2)An action may be brought on the previously settled right of action if a court sets aside the agreement effecting the settlement under subsection (3).(3)A court, by order on application, may set aside the agreement effecting the settlement if the court considers—

(a)a cause of action for the abuse claim would have accrued when the agreement was entered into if section 33IC had been in force at that time; and

(b)it is just and reasonable to set aside the agreement.

(4)If a court makes an order under subsection (3)—

(a)the agreement effecting the settlement is void despite any Act, law or rule of law; and

(b)a party to the agreement may not seek to recover money paid by, or for, the party under the agreement.

5Amendment of s 72A (Application of pt 1A)Section 72A(4), definition associated with, ‘section 33C’—omit, insert—sections 33C and 33IB6Amendment of sch 2 (Dictionary)Schedule 2, definition associated with, ‘section 33C’—omit, insert—sections 33C and 33IB